Debate Club

Does the Colorado Shooting Prove the Need for More Gun Control Laws? >

Guns Defend Good People From Bad People

One tragic massacre does not warrant the disarmament of all law-abiding citizens

July 26, 2012

About Gene Hoffman:

Gene Hoffman is chairman of the Calguns Foundation, a nonprofit that seeks to inform government and protect the rights of individuals to acquire, own, and lawfully use firearms in California.

Evil is a part of life, and this has been true since the dawn of our civilization.

Evil recently appeared in a dark theater in Aurora, Colo. As we know, a disturbed man hurt and massacred dozens.

And it is a natural human emotion to think of ways to stop it from happening again. This is now causing some people to push for the disarmament of all, regardless of who they are, and regardless of whether they are dangerous to other people.

[Read the U.S. News debate: Should People Be Allowed to Carry Guns Openly]

But there are other evils in this world. Our civil right to armed self defense has a storied history of protecting us from many of those evils:

  • This right protected the abolitionists who took the message that slavery was evil directly into the slave states.
  • After the civil war, the right to bear arms was used to protect freedmen from the brutal violence of the Ku Klux Klan.
  • Arms continued to protect civil rights workers even through the 1960s as the twin specters of racism and the Klan itself, had permeated local law enforcement.
  • Today, the right to armed self defense protects the LGBT community from the twin evils of ignorance and hate.
  • The right to self defense also protects mothers and daughters from rapists, merchants from robbers, and families from home invaders.

The U.S. Department of Justice reports that guns are used 1,500,000 times a year to successfully defend good people from bad people—almost always without the firing of a single shot. The Colorado massacre is disturbing, but it must be seen in this context.

Like all civil rights, our right to self defense is dangerous and can be abused—ask a mourning soldier's parents about the abuse of the freedom of speech they experience at the hands of the Westboro Baptist Church.

[See photos of the Colorado movie theater shooting.]

But we as a country placed our civil rights, and their risks, into our Bill of Rights and the 14th Amendment for a single reason: There are much worse evils than a single tragic event.

The laws we have today already bar those people who have been shown to be violent, or a risk to self or others, from buying or even possessing guns. But laws can't predict who will become violent or insane, nor can laws prevent criminals from doing violence. We must tread lightly and acknowledge the beneficial side of the civil right to armed self defense.

The insane actions of one person should not be cause to infringe the civil rights of millions of law-abiding citizens.

Tags:
Colorado,
gun control and gun rights
Other Arguments
#2

No — If theatergoers had been armed and trained, they could have protected themselves

MIKE SWEENEY, Communications Manager at the Gun Owners' Action League

#3

No — Proponents for more gun control are making a dangerous argument

ERICH PRATT, Director of Communications for Gun Owners of America

#4
#5

Yes — Even gun owners support background checks for gun sales

DAN GROSS, President of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence and the Brady Center

#6

Yes — Children being gunned down by maniacs is not the price of freedom

JOSHUA HORWITZ, Executive Director of the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence

#7

Yes — We need restrictions on both gun and ammunition sales

JOSH SUGARMANN, Founder and Executive Director of the Violence Policy Center,

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Oklahoma Tornado Reminds Us of the Value of Teachers

The Oklahoma tornado reminds us of all the roles teachers take on.

IRS, AP and James Rosen Scandals Strike at the First Amendment

The Obama scandals paint a picture of an administration at odds with the First Amendment.

Anthony Weiner Is Too Liberal to Be New York City Mayor

New York City doesn't need another Democratic mayor.

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

Democrats Should Be Worried About Polls After Obama Scandals

Democrats should be more worried about President Obama's approval ratings.

Tea Party IRS Rally Should Wait Until After Moore Tornado Recovery

Tea party rallies against the IRS should wait until the tornado victims are taken care of.

Advertisement