Debate Club

Did the U.S. Withdraw from Iraq Too Soon? >

It's Already Too Late in Iraq

The war should never have been launched--so it can't be ended soon enough

January 23, 2012

About Phyllis Bennis:

Phyllis Bennis directs the New Internationalism Project at the Institute for Policy Studies. She is also a fellow of the Transnational Institute in Amsterdam. In 2001 she helped found and remains on the steering committee of the U.S. Campaign to End Israeli Occupation. She continues to serve as an adviser to several top UN officials on Middle East and UN democratization issues.

Far from being "too soon," the U.S. troop withdrawal from Iraq came more than eight years too late--and still, the war isn't over. This war should never have been launched, so it can't be ended soon enough.

[Why America Is More Violent Than Other Democracies.]

The war was based on lies--remember the "weapons of mass destruction" that weren't there, the "links to 9/11" that never happened, the "mobile weapons laboratories" that didn't exist? Withdrawing troops now, after eight years of occupation, doesn't mean the U.S. achieved victory. It was a defeat for the U.S. and a disaster for the people of Iraq. A terrible dictator (who had been armed, paid, and backed by the U.S., we should not forget) was indeed overthrown. But Iraqis faced years without security, basic services, electricity--let alone democracy, human rights, or independence.

The U.S. war, following more than a decade of devastating U.S.-imposed economic sanctions, ravaged the infrastructure and social fabric of Iraq, leaving behind a broken country ruled by a corrupt sectarian government. For eight years, with up to 182,600 U.S. and allied troops occupying the country at any one time, Iraq was one of the most dangerous countries in the world, and remains so today. That would still be the case if we had pulled out years ago, or if we waited another one, two, or 25 years.

[Iran Threatens U.S., Persian Gulf Cities with Missile Attacks.]

Of course, it's important that U.S. troops and Pentagon-paid contractors have been withdrawn. Indeed it's a huge victory for the U.S. and global anti-war movements who made it imperative for President Obama to enforce the U.S.-Iraq agreement requiring just that. But the U.S. war is not over. U.S. troops have left Iraq, but thousands are streaming into Kuwait and onto Navy ships cruising just "over the horizon." Maybe just a few hundred uniformed U.S. troops will be left in Iraq, but 15,000 or more State Department-paid mercenaries are pouring in, doing the same things--guarding the biggest-in-the-world U.S. embassy, training Iraqis to use the weapons we're still flooding the country with, "special operations"--that continue the instability. The contractors include some of the same armed men whose Pentagon-paid violence led to such outrage in the past. Americans may have forgotten, but Iraqis certainly remember.

It's already too late, but the whole U.S. war in Iraq, not only the presence of uniformed troops, needs to end completely. That includes ending the related wars--in Afghanistan and Pakistan, the drone wars in Yemen and Somalia and beyond, the threatened wars against Iran. Only then can we really claim we've "withdrawn from Iraq."

Tags:
military strategy,
military,
Iraq war (2003-2011),
Iraq
Other Arguments
#1

Yes — The U.S. must pressure Iraq to avoid a new sectarian civil war

ROBERT ZARATE, Policy Director of the Foreign Policy Initiative

#3

No — The United States should never have invaded in the first place

CHRISTOPHER PREBLE, Vice President for Foreign Policy Studies at the Cato Institute

#4

No — Mission to promote "democracy" in Iraq was an unobtainable objective

DANIEL J. GALLINGTON, Senior Policy and Program Adviser at the George C. Marshall Institute

#5
#6
#7

Yes — Iraq might take 15 or 20 years to become a functioning democracy

MICHELE DUNNE, Director of the Atlantic Council's Rafik Hariri Center for the Middle East

#8

Yes — The real winner in the Middle East will be Iran

HELLE DALE, Senior Fellow in Public Diplomacy Studies at the Heritage Foundation

#9

Yes — Pulling the covers over our eyes and leaving the region is not a thought-through strategy

THOMAS HENRIKSEN, Senior Fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution and at the U.S. Joint Special Operations University

#10

Yes — The president, in his own words, wanted to fulfill a campaign promise

DANIELLE PLETKA, Vice President for Foreign and Defense Policy Studies at the American Enterprise Institute

#11
#12

No — The Iraq War cost the United States 4,421 lives and $806 billion

DENNIS KUCINICH, U.S. Representative, Ohio's 10th District

Reader Comments Read all comments (10)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Sadaam was paying terrorist to bomb Isreal.

Would you rather see Isreal invade to protect itself and risk a world war or sit around and think you have a strategic opinion on keeping the world and Americans safe.

Don't use the argument that we found no wmd's!

He used and posed chemical weapons on Iran and his own countrymen in the north, saught Nuclear Technology and was just insane enough to use them. He tried to ignite a world war back in 1991 when he launched SCUD's at Isreal in hope that isreal would retaliate and stir islamic countries to his aid.

Also for all you greenies, he flodded the Persian Gulf with an unparelleld oilslick that killed off hundres of thousands of species indiginous to the to the specific reagion of the catastrophe

If that doesn't explain that iraq was a top 2 country on the list of terror I don't know what will.

Ty of CA 6:43PM May 23, 2012

USA has to learn first that is not the world´s sheriff and that each country has its autonomy to decide what to do with it´s future. And from now and forever to let using the word "DEMOCRACY" as garbagge.

Lopes 4:08AM February 05, 2012

USA has to learn first that is not the world´s sheriff and that each country has its autonomy to decide what to do with it´s future. And from and forever to let using the word "DEMOCRACY" as gurbagge.

Lopes 4:05AM February 05, 2012

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.


Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.


You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Romney's Bain Experience Wasn't Real American Capitalism

The fact that Bain Capital served to make money for investors, not to create jobs, could endanger Romney.

Why Is Mitt Romney Embracing Birther Donald Trump?

Maybe Trump is Romney's idea of a rich guy that common people can relate to?

Does Barack Obama Actually Want to Be Re-Elected?

The president's lack of enthusiasm jeopardizes his campaign.

3 Reasons Why the Scott Walker Wisconsin Recall Election Matters

Scott Walker is a canary in a coal mine.

The Right's Fixation With 'Vetting' Obama

American voters can use the past four years to judge Obama's qualifications as president

Voters Tuning Out Flood of 2012 Super PAC, Campaign Ads

This will be the year of grassroots voters, not Nielsen families.

Scott Walker's Union Fight Helps Mitt Romney Against Barack Obama

The Wisconsin governor refuses to back down from his opposition to collective bargaining.

Why Is It Only Women Who Need 'Informing' on Reproductive Health?

Men's sexual behavior could also use some "controlling."

Advertisement