Debate Club

Did the U.S. Withdraw from Iraq Too Soon? >

American Counter-terrorism Efforts Will Suffer

The real winner in the Middle East will be Iran

January 23, 2012

About Helle Dale:

Helle C. Dale is the Heritage Foundation's Senior Fellow in Public Diplomacy studies. Her current work focuses on the U.S. government's institutions and programs for strategic outreach to the public of foreign countries, as well as more traditional diplomacy, critical elements in American global leadership and in the war of ideas against violent extremism.

The short answer is 'yes.' The American troop withdrawal completed on December 15 jeopardizes both the progress and the sacrifice made over the last 10 years in Iraq.

The Obama administration has chosen a reckless course of action. It withdrew U.S. troops from Iraq before victory had been consolidated. This will allow the president to claim a major campaign promise fulfilled before the next presidential election. Not only that, but in the rush to get out, the administration clumsily failed even to negotiate terms for extending the troop presence before the deadline ran out.

[Iran Could Strike US in Afghanistan, Iraq.]

Let us not forget, the Bush administration also planned to leave Iraq by the end of 2011. But their plan called for keeping a number of U.S. forces in Iraq as trainers and advisors, a far more responsible course of action.

For the Iraqi people, the consequences of the premature American withdrawal will be instability, resurgence of terrorism and an uncertain future for Iraq's fledgling democracy. On December 22, a wave of violent, coordinated attacks killed at least 57 people, and just days after the December 15th withdrawal ceremony, the dominantly Shiite government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki purged many Sunni Arab leaders. Political instability is sure to follow. The Iraqi army and air force training will suffer as will air operations, the Iraqi air force having few helicopters and planes.

[Why America Is More Violent Than Other Democracies.]

For U.S. national security, likewise, the Obama administration's action will be detrimental. American counter-terrorism efforts will suffer as opportunities for intelligence gathering and surveillance will disappear. And of course the real winner in the Middle East will be Iran, whose interference in Iraqi politics and violations of its borders are sure to intensify. The Obama administration has washed its hands of an inconvenient war it never wanted. For this, many others will pay a steep price.

Tags:
Iran,
Barack Obama,
Obama administration,
military strategy,
military,
Iraq war (2003-2011),
Iraq
Other Arguments
#1

Yes — The U.S. must pressure Iraq to avoid a new sectarian civil war

ROBERT ZARATE, Policy Director of the Foreign Policy Initiative

#2

No — The war should never have been launched--so it can't be ended soon enough

PHYLLIS BENNIS, Director of the New Internationalism Project at the Institute for Policy Studies

#3

No — The United States should never have invaded in the first place

CHRISTOPHER PREBLE, Vice President for Foreign Policy Studies at the Cato Institute

#4

No — Mission to promote "democracy" in Iraq was an unobtainable objective

DANIEL J. GALLINGTON, Senior Policy and Program Adviser at the George C. Marshall Institute

#5
#6
#7

Yes — Iraq might take 15 or 20 years to become a functioning democracy

MICHELE DUNNE, Director of the Atlantic Council's Rafik Hariri Center for the Middle East

#9

Yes — Pulling the covers over our eyes and leaving the region is not a thought-through strategy

THOMAS HENRIKSEN, Senior Fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution and at the U.S. Joint Special Operations University

#10

Yes — The president, in his own words, wanted to fulfill a campaign promise

DANIELLE PLETKA, Vice President for Foreign and Defense Policy Studies at the American Enterprise Institute

#11
#12

No — The Iraq War cost the United States 4,421 lives and $806 billion

DENNIS KUCINICH, U.S. Representative, Ohio's 10th District

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
President Obama's Code Pink Heckler Medea Benjamin Was Plain Rude

It's become acceptable for people to interrupt the president while he is delivering a formal speech on a deadly serious topic.

Obama Commerce Nominee Penny Pritzker’s Tax Problem

Obama’s Commerce Department nominee has some Romney-esque tax issues.

Oklahoma Tornado Reminds Us of the Value of Teachers

The Oklahoma tornado reminds us of all the roles teachers take on.

IRS, AP and James Rosen Scandals Strike at the First Amendment

The Obama scandals paint a picture of an administration at odds with the First Amendment.

Anthony Weiner Is Too Liberal to Be New York City Mayor

New York City doesn't need another Democratic mayor.

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

Advertisement