Debate Club

Did Obama Lay Out a Winning Agenda for 2012 in His State of the Union Address? >

Winning Words, But Not a Winner

Obama didn't take any blame for America's problems

January 25, 2012

About Lara Brown:

Lara M. Brown, Ph.D., is an assistant professor in the Department of Political Science at Villanova University. She is the author of Jockeying for the American Presidency: The Political Opportunism of Aspirants. She also served in President William J. Clinton’s administration at the U.S. Department of Education. Currently, Dr. Brown serves on the board of the bipartisan, pro-woman non-profit organization, The New Agenda.

President Barack Obama's State of the Union Address was sprinkled with fortifying words for Democrats ("Teachers matter"), needling barbs for Republicans ("No drama"), and post-partisan promises for independents ("consensus around common sense ideas"). But the speech failed to deliver a clear message or set a discernible agenda because of its noticeable contradictions.

[Pictures: Obama Delivers His Third State of the Union Address.]

More tempered than his speech last month in Osawatomie, Kan., the president continued to press on the theme of "fairness," harkening back to both President Harry Truman's "Fair Deal" and President Teddy Roosevelt's "Square Deal." Obama encouragingly proclaimed that under his watch, we would "return to the American values of fair play and shared responsibility" and "apply the same rules from top to bottom: no bailouts, no handouts, and no cop-outs."

Yet he touted the success of the federal government's "bailout" of General Motors; proposed a new mortgage refinance plan to "bailout" underwater homeowners; and urged Congress to "bailout" students facing interest rate increases on their education loans next summer.

Obama also called for "doubling the number of work study jobs," extending "the tuition tax credit," and spurring "energy innovation" by giving "businesses incentives to upgrade their buildings." He further advocated not only a "tax cut" for "American manufacturer[s]," including a doubling of the break for "high-tech manufacturer[s]" who make their "products here," but also a program to help these businesses with "financing a new plant, equipment, or training for new workers." As genuinely worthwhile as many of these proposals may be, it is tough not to characterize them as "handouts."

[With Fairness, Obama Finds a Winning State of the Union Theme.]

Beyond this, the president took no responsibility for the heated "temperature in this town," or the "inefficient, outdated, and remote" character of the executive branch. Operating in campaign mode, using somewhat veiled language, Obama laid blame on the past administration and the Wall Street banks for the weak economy, and congressional procedure, corrupt practices, and partisan gamesmanship for "what's broken" in Washington. Isn't this a "cop-out?"

Despite what may be described as Obama's honest intentions to ensure that "everyone gets a fair shot, everyone does their fair share, and everyone plays by the same rules," his speech offered up several partisan proposals that can easily be decried by Republicans as evidence of his "crony capitalist" or, worse, "socialist" inclinations toward governing. The president's State of the Union address weakened, rather than bolstered, his campaign's platform built on "fairness."

Tags:
State of the Union,
Barack Obama,
Obama administration
Other Arguments
#1

No — Presidents have at best only a marginal ability to shape their own political context

DAVID CROCKETT, Author of 'Running Against the Grain: How Opposition Candidates Win Presidential Elections'

#3

No — President may call his speech a "blueprint," but the design rests on a flawed foundation

FORD O'CONNELL, Republican Strategist, Conservative Activist, and Political Analyst

#3
#5

No — This State of the Union speech will likely be forgotten by the beginning of next week

RON BONJEAN, Former Chief of Staff for the Senate Republican Conference

#6

Yes — Obama's speech was directed at the voting public, not a lawmaking Congress

DONNA R. HOFFMAN, Co-Author of 'Addressing the State of the Union: The Evolution and Impact of the President's Big Speech'

#7
#8

Yes — Democrats, Republicans, and independents all gave the speech high marks

KRYSTAL BALL, MSNBC Contributor and Former Democratic Nominee for Congress in the First District of Virginia

Reader Comments Read all comments (1)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Ms. Brown, your inclusive comment says it all:

"Operating in campaign mode, using somewhat veiled language, Obama laid blame on the past administration and the Wall Street banks for the weak economy, and congressional procedure, corrupt practices, and partisan gamesmanship for 'what's broken' in Washington. Isn't this a 'cop-out?'"

Not taking blame for anything has certainly become Barack Obama's trade mark. It takes a big man (or woman) to admit their mistakes and this person remains very small, indeed!

Just for the heck of it, I googled, "Obama takes blame". Of the few most prominent, yet belittled, responses was where he "takes the blame" for the Republican re-take of the House in November, 2010. Yet, he then states obliquely that is was, in essence, the Democrat Party's fault for losing the House (...whoa)!!

Then, I googled, "Obama blames", and the entries were endless......

Of the most comical responses where President Obama blames the worsening economy on ATM's, I viewed the following: "I saw 6 ATM's in an alley, killing a Job. It looked like a hate crime"!

IMHO, this wholly defines Barack Obama and his entire administration.

Harry Reasoner of MA 1:33PM February 04, 2012

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.


Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.


You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Donald Trump Makes Kim Kardashian Look Good

At least Kim Kardashian doesn't take herself seriously.

The Vietnam War Still Haunts Us

History rhymes once again, thanks so much.

'Transcripters' Make Birthers Look Smart

Now the fringe right wants the president's university grades to prove he wasn't a good student.

Obama Must Do More to Protect the Intellectual Property Industry

The Obama administration needs to protect the industry's creativity and innovation.

Is Congress Getting Dumber?

That Congress is speaking at a lower grade level than it was seven years ago may be due to the unfortunate tendency to equate education with elitism.

Obama's Remarkable Silence on Latin American Press Abuses

President Obama's silence on press freedom in Latin America is troubling.

Why the Media Is Giving Romney a Pass on Trump's Birtherism

Why the media hasn't pressed Mitt Romney about Donald Trump's birther fantasies.

Romney's Bain Experience Wasn't Real American Capitalism

The fact that Bain Capital served to make money for investors, not to create jobs, could endanger Romney.

Advertisement