Debate Club

Did Obama Lay Out a Winning Agenda for 2012 in His State of the Union Address? >

Winning Words, But Not a Winner

Obama didn't take any blame for America's problems

January 25, 2012

About Lara Brown:

Lara M. Brown, Ph.D., is an assistant professor in the Department of Political Science at Villanova University and the author of Jockeying for the American Presidency: The Political Opportunism of Aspirants. She also served in President William J. Clinton’s administration at the U.S. Department of Education.

President Barack Obama's State of the Union Address was sprinkled with fortifying words for Democrats ("Teachers matter"), needling barbs for Republicans ("No drama"), and post-partisan promises for independents ("consensus around common sense ideas"). But the speech failed to deliver a clear message or set a discernible agenda because of its noticeable contradictions.

[Pictures: Obama Delivers His Third State of the Union Address.]

More tempered than his speech last month in Osawatomie, Kan., the president continued to press on the theme of "fairness," harkening back to both President Harry Truman's "Fair Deal" and President Teddy Roosevelt's "Square Deal." Obama encouragingly proclaimed that under his watch, we would "return to the American values of fair play and shared responsibility" and "apply the same rules from top to bottom: no bailouts, no handouts, and no cop-outs."

Yet he touted the success of the federal government's "bailout" of General Motors; proposed a new mortgage refinance plan to "bailout" underwater homeowners; and urged Congress to "bailout" students facing interest rate increases on their education loans next summer.

Obama also called for "doubling the number of work study jobs," extending "the tuition tax credit," and spurring "energy innovation" by giving "businesses incentives to upgrade their buildings." He further advocated not only a "tax cut" for "American manufacturer[s]," including a doubling of the break for "high-tech manufacturer[s]" who make their "products here," but also a program to help these businesses with "financing a new plant, equipment, or training for new workers." As genuinely worthwhile as many of these proposals may be, it is tough not to characterize them as "handouts."

[With Fairness, Obama Finds a Winning State of the Union Theme.]

Beyond this, the president took no responsibility for the heated "temperature in this town," or the "inefficient, outdated, and remote" character of the executive branch. Operating in campaign mode, using somewhat veiled language, Obama laid blame on the past administration and the Wall Street banks for the weak economy, and congressional procedure, corrupt practices, and partisan gamesmanship for "what's broken" in Washington. Isn't this a "cop-out?"

Despite what may be described as Obama's honest intentions to ensure that "everyone gets a fair shot, everyone does their fair share, and everyone plays by the same rules," his speech offered up several partisan proposals that can easily be decried by Republicans as evidence of his "crony capitalist" or, worse, "socialist" inclinations toward governing. The president's State of the Union address weakened, rather than bolstered, his campaign's platform built on "fairness."

Tags:
State of the Union,
Barack Obama,
Obama administration
Other Arguments
#1

No — Presidents have at best only a marginal ability to shape their own political context

DAVID CROCKETT, Author of 'Running Against the Grain: How Opposition Candidates Win Presidential Elections'

#3

No — President may call his speech a "blueprint," but the design rests on a flawed foundation

FORD O'CONNELL, Republican Strategist, Conservative Activist, and Political Analyst

#4
#5

No — This State of the Union speech will likely be forgotten by the beginning of next week

RON BONJEAN, Former Chief of Staff for the Senate Republican Conference

#6

Yes — Obama's speech was directed at the voting public, not a lawmaking Congress

DONNA R. HOFFMAN, Co-Author of 'Addressing the State of the Union: The Evolution and Impact of the President's Big Speech'

#7
#8

Yes — Democrats, Republicans, and independents all gave the speech high marks

KRYSTAL BALL, MSNBC Contributor and Former Democratic Nominee for Congress in the First District of Virginia

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Obama Commerce Nominee Penny Pritzker’s Tax Problem

Obama’s Commerce Department nominee has some Romney-esque tax issues.

Oklahoma Tornado Reminds Us of the Value of Teachers

The Oklahoma tornado reminds us of all the roles teachers take on.

IRS, AP and James Rosen Scandals Strike at the First Amendment

The Obama scandals paint a picture of an administration at odds with the First Amendment.

Anthony Weiner Is Too Liberal to Be New York City Mayor

New York City doesn't need another Democratic mayor.

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

Democrats Should Be Worried About Polls After Obama Scandals

Democrats should be more worried about President Obama's approval ratings.

Advertisement