Obama's Speech Will Be Forgotten

By SHARE

No. Now, to be fair, I think the operative word in the question is "winning." Obama certainly laid out an agenda for 2012, though there was nothing radically different in it from what he has said before. But to think of the address itself as a critical element of victory grossly exaggerates the impact of the speech, and the influence of the president.

[Obama Pushes STEM in State of the Union.]

The fact is that most voters will have forgotten the speech by—well, by now. We know presidents have at best a minimal ability to move public opinion through rhetoric, and Obama is no different. Last night's speech is not going to change the basic tenor of political discourse in this country. The focus of the political class will quickly return to the Republican nomination race, and as long as that contest persists, the national conversation will be centered on the GOP. This speech will join the same category as most annual messages—forgotten.

We should also recognize that presidents have at best only a marginal ability to shape their own political context. Obama's re-election prospects are far more contingent on things outside of his control. For example, nothing about last night's address will change the basic dynamics of a divided and highly polarized legislative branch this year, and one would expect the political calculations that are a normal part of interbranch relations to influence the fall contest. Add to that the unknown of how the Supreme Court will rule on Obama's signature legislative accomplishment--whether it upholds or overturns "Obamacare," the decision will motivate voters in unpredictable ways.

[Obama Praises Military in State of the Union.]

Then we have events truly outside the president's control. Little of last night's speech dwelled on foreign policy, but does anyone doubt that a fiscal crisis in Europe would impact the American economy—certainly the most important item influencing the fall vote? Finally, as much as Obama's surrogates want to influence the GOP nomination race, we do not yet know who his opponent will be, and how that knowledge will affect the dynamics of the general election.

All of the above makes this speech perhaps the least important aspect of Obama's fortunes in 2012.

David Crockett

About David Crockett Author of 'Running Against the Grain: How Opposition Candidates Win Presidential Elections'

Tags
State of the Union
Obama, Barack
Obama administration
speeches

Other Arguments

#2
24 Pts
Winning Words, But Not a Winner

No – Winning Words, But Not a Winner

Lara Brown Professor at Villanova University

#3
23 Pts
Obama's State of the Union Failed

No – Obama's State of the Union Failed

Ford O'Connell Republican Strategist, Conservative Activist, and Political Analyst

#4
21 Pts
Obama's Side of the Nation's Story

No – Obama's Side of the Nation's Story

Stephanie Slade Project Director at The Winston Group

#5
15 Pts
Obama Played It Safe

No – Obama Played It Safe

Ron Bonjean Former Chief of Staff for the Senate Republican Conference

#6
12 Pts
State of the Union Was Typical for Election Year

Yes – State of the Union Was Typical for Election Year

Donna R. Hoffman Co-Author of 'Addressing the State of the Union: The Evolution and Impact of the President's Big Speech'

#7
-1 Pts
Incumbents Have History on Their Side

Yes – Incumbents Have History on Their Side

Matt Schlapp Founder of Cove Strategies

#8
-6 Pts
Obama Crafted a Winning Message

Yes – Obama Crafted a Winning Message

Krystal Ball MSNBC Contributor and Former Democratic Nominee for Congress in the First District of Virginia

You Might Also Like


See More