Obama's Side of the Nation's Story


Whether the agenda President Obama laid out in Tuesday's State of the Union address proves to be a winning one will depend entirely on the ability of the eventual Republican nominee to provide a compelling counter-narrative. That candidate will need to make the case that the Democratic plan represents an intensified commitment to infusing the private sector with ever more government interference and control. More importantly, he will need to persuade voters that more government will lead to greater inefficiencies at a time when the struggling American economy can least afford it.

[Obama Praises Military in State of the Union.]

Obama's proposal that the federal government redouble its efforts to train workers in "skills that will lead directly to a job" is a perfect example. Republicans will need to argue that such a plan necessarily requires that predictions be made about which industries will need workers and which skills those workers will need to possess—judgments government is uniquely ill-suited to be making. Policymakers will do their best to determine where vacancies are likely to arise. But no amount of top-down guesstimation can match the power of the markets to seamlessly allocate labor and capital. In the end, there's no surer way to end up with a gross mismatch between skills supplied and skills demanded than to hand over the process of "training" to a government bureaucracy.

Obama also wants to reach into the energy industry and choose winners (shale gas, wind power) and losers (oil) by shifting tax cuts and giveaways from one favored sector to another. Republicans will need to emphasize government's lousy track record in this area and remind voters how wasteful government-sponsored "venture capitalism" can be. At a time when concern over the national debt sits at historic highs, pouring billions of taxpayer dollars into boondoggles like Solyndra is exactly the wrong course of action.

[Obama Targets Romney in State of the Union Address.]

On the surface, Democratic arguments for publicly funded job training and investments in clean energy may seem to make sense. The challenge for Republicans will be to persuade the electorate that such proposals are bad economic policy hiding under a shiny coat of paint. If they can succeed, Obama's agenda might turn out to be a losing one. But that's a big, important if.

Stephanie Slade

About Stephanie Slade Project Director at The Winston Group

Obama administration
Obama, Barack
State of the Union

Other Arguments

41 Pts
Obama's Speech Will Be Forgotten

No – Obama's Speech Will Be Forgotten

David Crockett Author of 'Running Against the Grain: How Opposition Candidates Win Presidential Elections'

24 Pts
Winning Words, But Not a Winner

No – Winning Words, But Not a Winner

Lara Brown Professor at Villanova University

23 Pts
Obama's State of the Union Failed

No – Obama's State of the Union Failed

Ford O'Connell Republican Strategist, Conservative Activist, and Political Analyst

15 Pts
Obama Played It Safe

No – Obama Played It Safe

Ron Bonjean Former Chief of Staff for the Senate Republican Conference

12 Pts
State of the Union Was Typical for Election Year

Yes – State of the Union Was Typical for Election Year

Donna R. Hoffman Co-Author of 'Addressing the State of the Union: The Evolution and Impact of the President's Big Speech'

-1 Pts
Incumbents Have History on Their Side

Yes – Incumbents Have History on Their Side

Matt Schlapp Founder of Cove Strategies

-6 Pts
Obama Crafted a Winning Message

Yes – Obama Crafted a Winning Message

Krystal Ball MSNBC Contributor and Former Democratic Nominee for Congress in the First District of Virginia

You Might Also Like

See More