Debate Club

Did Obama Lay Out a Winning Agenda for 2012 in His State of the Union Address? >

Incumbents Have History on Their Side

Even knowing the president's case for re-election is a defensive one, it could still work

January 25, 2012

About Matt Schlapp:

Matt Schlapp founded Cove Strategies, a legislative, communications and political consulting firm, with his wife. Previously, Schlapp was President George W. Bush's deputy assistant and his political director.

President Obama gave his first major stump speech in his 2012 re-election campaign, and he chose the well of the House of Representatives in which to give it.

He laid out clearly who he intends to run against: financially successful Americans who do not rely on "green energy" tax credits and subsidies to achieve their profits; Congress and most of its members; Wall Street; and his old stand-by, President George W. Bush.

[Obama Pushes STEM in State of the Union.]

The president did not make the case to the American people, or at least those who stay up and watch these speeches, that his tenure has resulted in the fulfillment of his lofty campaign promises from 2008. Instead, he indicated that his re-election will hinge on making the case that you cannot trust Republicans on the major issue of the day: attacking rich people, especially if they work in the oil patch or on Wall Street, but really any rich person will do.

President Obama also laid out a new definition for wealthy: anyone who had a good year financially, or runs their business through their personal tax return, like almost every small business does.

Even knowing the president's case for re-election is a defensive one, it could still work. Presidents tend to get a second term from the American people. In re-election campaigns from FDR to George W. Bush, only three incumbents lost re-election contests (and one of those was not really an incumbent.) President Obama knows history is on his side, even with weak approval numbers and a sluggish economy.

The Republican response to the battle on the rich will be to lift some of the effective lines from Governor Daniels' excellent rebuttal. Mitch Daniels said essentially that Americans don't hate rich people; they want to be rich people.

[Obama Praises Military in State of the Union.]

As Americans watched the president give his eloquent remarks last night, they probably noticed the House speaker sitting behind him. If the president secures a second term, only Speaker Boehner in conjunction with additional Republicans in the Senate can stop his class warfare agenda replete with higher taxes, more government regulations, and companion programs to Obamacare. Wealthy Americans who are worried about this agenda and its effect on their businesses may wish to make some investments of their own in politics. They should take every appropriate step to make sure Nancy Pelosi does not regain a majority in the House next year, or everything the president advocated for will actually become law.

Whatever else happens in November, one thing is certain: We need John Boehner in that chair.

Tags:
State of the Union,
Barack Obama,
Obama administration
Other Arguments
#1

No — Presidents have at best only a marginal ability to shape their own political context

DAVID CROCKETT, Author of 'Running Against the Grain: How Opposition Candidates Win Presidential Elections'

#2

No — Obama didn't take any blame for America's problems

LARA BROWN, Professor at Villanova University

#3

No — President may call his speech a "blueprint," but the design rests on a flawed foundation

FORD O'CONNELL, Republican Strategist, Conservative Activist, and Political Analyst

#4
#5

No — This State of the Union speech will likely be forgotten by the beginning of next week

RON BONJEAN, Former Chief of Staff for the Senate Republican Conference

#6

Yes — Obama's speech was directed at the voting public, not a lawmaking Congress

DONNA R. HOFFMAN, Co-Author of 'Addressing the State of the Union: The Evolution and Impact of the President's Big Speech'

#8

Yes — Democrats, Republicans, and independents all gave the speech high marks

KRYSTAL BALL, MSNBC Contributor and Former Democratic Nominee for Congress in the First District of Virginia

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Obamacare Opponents Have to Keep Pushing Repeal

The way to repeal Obamacare is to hasten its ugly results.

Can Obama's Berlin Speech Match John F. Kennedy's and Ronald Reagan's?

The two famous Berlin speeches almost never were.

Reform Conservatives Need to Tackle Unemployment and Jobs

"Reform conservatives" are doing good work, but need to think about the ills of long-term unemployment.

If Background Checks are Good Enough for Guns, They're Good Enough for Jobs

Employers need to be able to consider all factors before making a hire.

NSA Leaker Edward Snowden Is Neither a Whistle-Blower Nor a Civil Disobeyer

Resisters who break a law must accept that they may be arrested and have a duty to submit to punishment.

Obama Should Bring Small Business Owners on His Trip to Africa

This country needs a national reality show.

Russian President Vladimir Putin’s Divorce and Robert Kraft’s Super Bowl Ring

What took Lyudmila Putina so long?

Syria, Israel and the Obama Administration's Absentee Foreign Policy

Creating a mess you are going to leave for someone else to clean up is not a good way to manage U.S. foreign policy.

Advertisement