Debate Club

Common Core's Intent Is Being Undermined

By + More

Common Core Standards began as an initiative to help all students acquire the knowledge and skills they need to succeed in college and the workforce. Unfortunately, in some states, Common Core is becoming the Vietnam of education issues, a battleground of dubious merit that reflects much more global political power struggles. This dynamic threatens to undermine Common Core’s original intent.

[SPECIAL REPORT: A Guide to Common Core]

Surely, most voters do not buy all-purpose right-wing fringe arguments that, for example, Common Core is a conspiracy to establish one-world government. That’s cold comfort, though, for more moderate Republicans in states like Indiana who believe in Common Core but where small bands of tea partiers have proven they can take out incumbents in primary elections.

This disconnection between politics and policy also operates in the opposite direction. Even the pro-Common Core folks at the Fordham Foundation estimate the new standards are no more rigorous than what Indiana has now. The state assessment system, which effectively sets lower high school graduation standards for poor and minority students, might have been a much better target for change. The decision to maintain all the focus on adopting Common Core and very little on opposing the state’s decision last year to keep that system now makes Common Core’s fate in Indiana more or less moot.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the Republican Party.]

In states where Common Core is further advanced, some who push back on any change that inconvenience adults are using an old playbook: support, in principle, reforms in their early stages, then delay and undermine them as soon as they get underway. As Randi Weingarten, an early supporter of Common Core and President of the American Federation of Teachers has said, “Implementation is where reform dies.”

In Weingarten’s home state of New York, Weingarten and other union executives now contend that Common Core will lead to more testing when in fact it’s the union’s own policies that will do that. They say it will lead to the mass firing of teachers, when they know better than anyone that state laws and regulations — that they in fact wrote — make it impossible to fire even the most grossly incompetent teachers. Regardless of anyone’s intent, Common Core is again in this instance a distraction that’s working to divert attention from other more fundamentally important issues.

The thinkers and leaders behind Common Core have consistently stressed its power to change public instruction depends upon corresponding changes in student testing, teacher training, and curricula. Some research has found that higher standards have no impact with or without those corresponding changes. Yet even if one accepts the arguments behind the Common Core model, the task of aligning standards is proving easier said than done.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the economy.]

Critics in California – including the head of the California Teachers Association – are now questioning whether the $1.25 billion the state has dedicated to Common Core implementation is adequate (without of course saying what the right amount is). California might be better off directly investing those funds in a much-needed overhaul of its teacher training system or in remedies for the shortage of teachers in courses required for admission by the state’s higher education system.

In Vietnam, which ultimately became synonymous with the word “quagmire,” both sides withdrew long after it became clear that the potential benefits were outweighed by the mounting costs to lives and treasure. California, Indiana, and New York aren’t reflective of all states, but neither are they the only ones where the best policies around testing, teacher training and equity are collateral damage. Given the high-stakes, all parties agree are associated with quality education, these are mistakes we can’t afford to keep repeating.

Charles Barone

About Charles Barone  is policy director of Democrats for Education Reform.

Common Core

Other Arguments

158 Pts
Attempts to Standardize Education Are Doomed to Fail

No – Attempts to Standardize Education Are Doomed to Fail

Matt Kibbe is the President of FreedomWorks.

120 Pts
Common Core Causes Collateral Damage

No – Common Core Causes Collateral Damage

Mike McShane is a research fellow in education policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute.

109 Pts
Common Core Treats Students Like Soulless Widgets

No – Common Core Treats Students Like Soulless Widgets

Neal McCluskey is the associate director of the Cato Institute’s Center for Educational Freedom.

-89 Pts
Adult Problems Aren't More Important Than Student Needs

Yes – Adult Problems Aren't More Important Than Student Needs

Michelle Rhee is CEO at StudentsFirst and former chancellor of D.C. Public Schools.

-112 Pts
Keep the Core, but Course Correct to Achieve Its Promise

Yes – Keep the Core, but Course Correct to Achieve Its Promise

Dennis Van Roekel is president of the National Education Association.

-144 Pts
Give Common Core Time to Work

Yes – Give Common Core Time to Work

Jack Markell is in his second term as Governor of Delaware and served as co-chair of the Common Core State Standards initiative.

You Might Also Like

See More