Debate Club

Common Core Causes Collateral Damage

By + More

I have zero problem with a group of states coming together to adopt a common set of expectations for the students in their respective school systems. Looking at the Common Core standards themselves, they appear to organize the content and skills students need in a logical and coherent way. It is even possible that they are better than the standards that states had prior to their adoption.

But, adopting quality standards is miles away from leveraging them to improve instruction. On that count, I am increasingly inclined to believe that the Common Core will do more harm than good.

[SPECIAL REPORT: A Guide to Common Core]

The standards themselves were adopted in a mad dash for federal cash. They were announced on June 2, 2010, and within only two months, 28 states had adopted them (Kentucky actually adopted the standards before they were released!). One would think that states would need a little more time to make sure that they (a) agreed with the content of the standards and (b) had a reasonable plan to implement them, but most of these states were competing in the Department of Education’s Race to the Top program, which put 70 of its 500 points on developing and adopting common standards and assessments.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the economy.]

The second half of those promises, agreeing to participate in the consortia developing tests for the standards, is where states really got themselves in trouble. Signing up involved promising that states would purchase the tests and upgrade their technological infrastructure to administer them (both consortia are developing computer-based, not pencil and paper, tests). When the price points were announced in 2013, the $30 per student price tag was greater than what half of the states participating in the consortia currently pay. This caused Georgia, which currently spends about a third of the consortia price on testing, to leave its consortia that day. Upgrading technology also represents serious costs for states, many of which have only come to light recently. Just last month, Maryland announced it would need $100 million to get schools up to speed to administer the tests.

Promising to adopt new standards and new tests also has a profound impact on the school and teacher evaluation systems that rely on those tests as their primary metrics. As Dr. Morgan Polikoff of USC convincingly argued recently, a fair reading of the research literature finds that standards-based accountability has improved American education over the past two decades. By hastily shoehorning the Common Core into both school and teacher accountability systems, the Common Core risks undermining both.

We are already seeing serious pushback in New York, and teachers and school leaders will have a strong case for opposing the standards in numerous states that haven’t worked out coherent plans to transition from their current standards to the Common Core while maintaining the integrity of their evaluation systems. This risks derailing policies that have improved education.

Mike McShane

About Mike McShane is a research fellow in education policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute.

Tags
Common Core
education

Other Arguments

#1
158 Pts
Attempts to Standardize Education Are Doomed to Fail

No – Attempts to Standardize Education Are Doomed to Fail

Matt Kibbe is the President of FreedomWorks.

#3
109 Pts
Common Core Treats Students Like Soulless Widgets

No – Common Core Treats Students Like Soulless Widgets

Neal McCluskey is the associate director of the Cato Institute’s Center for Educational Freedom.

#4
-75 Pts
Common Core's Intent Is Being Undermined

Yes – Common Core's Intent Is Being Undermined

Charles Barone  is policy director of Democrats for Education Reform.

#5
-89 Pts
Adult Problems Aren't More Important Than Student Needs

Yes – Adult Problems Aren't More Important Than Student Needs

Michelle Rhee is CEO at StudentsFirst and former chancellor of D.C. Public Schools.

#6
-112 Pts
Keep the Core, but Course Correct to Achieve Its Promise

Yes – Keep the Core, but Course Correct to Achieve Its Promise

Dennis Van Roekel is president of the National Education Association.

#7
-144 Pts
Give Common Core Time to Work

Yes – Give Common Core Time to Work

Jack Markell is in his second term as Governor of Delaware and served as co-chair of the Common Core State Standards initiative.

You Might Also Like


See More