Debate Club

Are Teachers Overpaid? >

Higher Salaries Won't Improve Teacher Performance

Better pay is just as attractive to bad teachers as it is to great teachers

November 9, 2011

About Marcus Winters:

Marcus A. Winters is a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute and an assistant professor at the University of Colorado in Colorado Springs. He conducts research and writes extensively on education policy, including topics such as school choice, high school graduation rates, accountability, and special education.

Do teachers deserve higher salaries? It depends on what you mean by "deserve." From a policymaker's perspective, teachers are underpaid if raising their salaries would increase teacher quality enough to "pay off" in the form of higher student achievement. Under the current system, however, that's almost certainly not the case.

Improving teacher salaries could only improve teacher quality by enticing better candidates to enter the profession, by helping retain high-quality teachers, or by motivating teachers to improve their efforts in the classroom. Increasing teacher salaries within the current system would address none of these issues.

[Read: States Rights at Heart of New 'No Child Left Behind' Debate.]

Right now, whether a teacher works long hours or how much her students learn has no influence on how much she is paid. Instead, teacher pay is based entirely on years of experience and number of advanced degrees. Unfortunately, research consistently finds that those attributes are unrelated to a teacher's effectiveness. Simply increasing the amount of money that a teacher is paid for earning a master's degree or sticking around another year will not motivate her to improve her effectiveness in the classroom. True, higher salaries should lead more people to enter the profession—but an increase in teacher candidates shouldn't be expected to improve teacher quality, either. That's because research consistently shows that just about nothing we can observe about a teacher before he enters the classroom accurately predicts how effective he'll be. Some people have what it takes to be a great teacher, and some don't--and we have no way to tell before they start teaching. Increasing the pool of people who want to become teachers won't improve teacher quality unless school systems can accurately identify the best and worst candidates. They can't.

[Read: The End Is Near for No Child Left Behind.}

Finally, higher teacher salaries should be expected to increase teacher retention—but higher salaries are just as attractive to bad teachers as they are to great teachers. Increasing teacher salaries across the board without consideration of how effective a teacher is in the classroom, then, won't improve teacher quality.

Simply increasing teacher salaries without addressing the system by which those salaries are distributed will solve nothing. However, if we finally address the archaic and counterproductive compensation system for public school teachers—so that it pays effective teachers more than it pays ineffective ones—then improving teacher salaries might finally make sense.

Tags:
education policy,
education
Other Arguments
#1
#2

No — It is time to invest in the profession that makes all other professions possible

BARNETT BERRY, President and CEO of the Center for Teaching Quality

#3

No — Comparatively low U.S. salaries shrink pool of high-performing recruits

JACK JENNINGS, Founder and CEO of Center on Education Policy

#4

No — To fix education we must invest in our teachers, not flawed studies

RANDI WEINGARTEN, President of American Federation of Teachers

#5

No — To improve education system, attract higher quality teachers

ANDREAS SCHLEICHER, Special Adviser on Education Policy at the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

#7

Yes — Teaching is certainly challenging, but it is not uniquely so

ANDREW G. BIGGS, JASON RICHWINE, Experts at Heritage Foundation and American Enterprise Institute

#8

Yes — Choice--not pay--is the key to improving education

ROB PORT, Editor of SayAnythingBlog.com

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
President Obama's Code Pink Heckler Medea Benjamin Was Plain Rude

It's become acceptable for people to interrupt the president while he is delivering a formal speech on a deadly serious topic.

Obama Commerce Nominee Penny Pritzker’s Tax Problem

Obama’s Commerce Department nominee has some Romney-esque tax issues.

Oklahoma Tornado Reminds Us of the Value of Teachers

The Oklahoma tornado reminds us of all the roles teachers take on.

IRS, AP and James Rosen Scandals Strike at the First Amendment

The Obama scandals paint a picture of an administration at odds with the First Amendment.

Anthony Weiner Is Too Liberal to Be New York City Mayor

New York City doesn't need another Democratic mayor.

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

Advertisement