Debate Club

Are Super PACs Harming U.S. Politics? >

Super PACs Are a Form of Political Participation

There is nothing wrong with presenting the voting public with more information

January 13, 2012

About David N. Bossie:

David N. Bossie is the president of Citizens United and Citizens United Productions.

Nearly two years ago, in Citizens United v. FEC, the United States Supreme Court restored the right to free political speech for individuals coming together through corporations (like Citizens United) and unions. In the wake of Citizens United, we have seen the rise of super PACs and their ability to speak to voters about candidates directly, without having their message controlled by a campaign or party.

[Super PACs Defining the 2012 Presidential Race.]

This increase in political speech is helping the American political system, not harming it. As we've seen the Republican nomination process unfold, super PACs are bringing messages to voters in key states to help them assess the records and accomplishments of the candidates for president. The voting public deserves more information with which to make a decision as weighty as whom to elect as the next leader of the Free World.

But, like every other election year before it, members of the media are lamenting the amount of money being spent in this year's election because they have lost the power to control the message. President Barack Obama plans to raise and spend a billion dollars on his re-election campaign. No Republican candidate will come close to matching that number, so some independent super PACs have set out ambitious goals to raise hundreds of millions of dollars to help counter the Obama campaign juggernaut.

[Mogul Gives $5 Million to Pro-Gingrich Group.]

The truth is that nearly $2 billion are going to be spent, with or without super PACs. Super PACs are simply another way for Americans to participate in our political system. If certain politicians, members of the media, or the public at large are disturbed about the number of ads on TV or their content, they should change the channel or run an ad in response--not deny groups the freedom to air their messages and the public the opportunity to hear them. Such censorship would truly damage the American political process.

Tags:
primaries,
money,
elections,
2012 presidential election,
campaigns
Other Arguments
#1
#2
#3
#4

No — Super PACs fund political speech and are protected under he First Amendment

JOHN SAMPLES, Director of the Center for Representative Government at the Cato Institute

#6
#7

No — Super PACs have less influence than we think

JENNIFER MARSICO, Senior Research Associate at the American Enterprise Institute

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Republicans Can't Forget the Economy During Obama Scandals

Scandals provide good fodder for the GOP, but it can't forget about fixing unemployment.

Amidst Obama Scandals, Republicans Prepare a New Debt Ceiling Hostage

Republicans are preparing to take the debt ceiling hostage…again.

Benghazi, IRS and AP Scandals Reveal a Clueless President

The recent slew of scandals reveals an administration either incompetent or malicious.

The IRS Scandal Is About Budget Cuts, Not the Tea Party

Cutting the tax collection budget hurts everyone in the long-run.

Obama 'Going Bulworth' Wouldn't Give Him Power Over Republicans

Both Congress and presidents overestimate the power of the Oval Office.

Bureaucracy Keeps Adopted Children Stuck in International Limbo

The U.S. needs to do more to ease the international adoption process.

The Real Scandal Behind the Benghazi Emails and Attacks

The GOP focuses on talking points while ignoring dangerous security budget cuts.

House Republicans Waste Time With Obamacare Repeal Vote

Why is the House bothering to repeal Obamacare yet again?

Advertisement