Are Cuts to the Defense Budget Necessary? >
Military Already Underfunded, Thanks to Obama
Defense budget is not large enough to cover president's foreign policy agenda
November 21, 2011
About Mackenzie Eaglen:
Mackenzie Eaglen is a resident fellow at the Marilyn Ware Center for Security Studies at the American Enterprise Institute. She has worked on defense issues in the U.S. Congress, both House and Senate, and at the Pentagon in the Office of the Secretary of Defense and on the Joint Staff.
The question is misleading. Defense budget cuts are being implemented now. They've been going on for the past two years, and many more are planed in the near future. It's not a question of "if they're necessary" but how damaging they will be for a force that is only being used more, not less, everyday worldwide, and a military facing a readiness crisis after 10 years of constant combat.
Using Washington math, some say there have been no defense cuts. But President Obama's started slashing military plans and priorities since taking office. His first defense budget canceled or delayed some 50 major equipment programs, including ships, missile defense, cargo and fighter aircraft, and ground vehicles valued at more than $300 billion. Then, behind the scenes, the White House took another $78 billion out of the military's budget last winter.
[See a collection of political cartoons on the budget and deficit.]
President Obama was so pleased with these defense cuts, he vowed to repeat them by cutting another $400 billion from the military—even before there was a debt ceiling deal that further cuts defense spending.
That's not how the nation should build (or not build) a defense budget. The defense budget and military force size and structure are informed by the president's foreign policy, our nation's enduring vital national interests, the threats we face, and how to defend against them or deter others within certain margins of risk.
[See photos of U.S. troops in Afghanistan.]
These cuts are coming at a time when U.S. foreign policy objectives and the hard power to support them are increasingly out of whack. President Obama is cashing in the defense budget even though, over the past three years, he surged forces in Afghanistan (twice), launched a new air war over Libya, dramatically increased counterterrorism operations with Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia, and sent troops to Africa to fight the Lord's Resistance Army. Nor is there any reason to think he would hesitate to send troops to provide relief in the next natural disaster, just as he has used them to aid victims in Japan and Haiti. Obama has even proposed keeping 1,200 National Guard troops at the United States' southwestern border to augment customs officers.
Washington can continue to underfund the military, but it will not mean a less ambitious foreign policy. It will mean hollow security and treaty commitments, greatly increased risk of conflict, and substantially greater casualties for the men and women who serve in the military.
- See a slide show of 6 vulnerable potential terrorist targets.
- Check out our editorial cartoons on Afghanistan.
- See photos of the prison at Guantánamo Bay.
- Other Arguments
-
#18538
Yes — Reducing the military budget means less war, not more
PATRICK TAKAHASHI, Director Emeritus at the University of Hawaii
-
#26024
Yes — Reductions should be a gradual process led by the military braintrust
TRAVIS SHARP, Bacevich Fellow at the Center for a New American Security
-
#36430
Yes — By limiting expenditures, U.S. can actually solidify its defense
RON PAUL, U.S. Representative and Republican Candidate for President
-
#43319
Yes — Military must play its part here to halt the deficit threat too
LAWRENCE J. KORB, Former Assistant Secretary of Defense
-
#53019
Yes — Cuts may be necessary, but don't shift the entire burden to the military
KORI SCHAKE, Bradley Professor of International Security Studies at the United States Military Academy at West Point, N.Y.
-
#62223
Yes — Restore order at the department and bring defense budgets back into line
GORDON ADAMS, Professor at American University
-
#72645
No — The solution to the debt crisis lies in entitlements and taxes, not the military budget
DOUG BERENSON, Director of the Defense & Aerospace Group at Avascent Group
-
#91544
No — The consequences of cutting the military budget are still not understood
J. RANDY FORBES, U.S. Representative and Chairman of the House Armed Services Readiness Subcommittee
Reader Comments Read all comments (3)
Blanye of CT 12:31PM December 14, 2011
Jeff of FL 5:23PM November 28, 2011
Richard Duffin of OH 10:09AM November 21, 2011