Debate Club

Are Cuts to the Defense Budget Necessary? >

It Is Time for Discipline, Defense

Restore order at the department and bring defense budgets back into line

November 21, 2011

About Gordon Adams:

Gordon Adams is a professor at American University and served as a senior budget official for national security in the Clinton administration.

America has never been militarily safer than it is today. No nation poses an existential threat to the country. The threat of a terrorist attack is diminishing. Cyber-warriors can attack the Internet, but our defenses against this challenge are largely civilian. We're not about to invade Iran or Pakistan. And a rising China is somewhere future, with a military we currently dwarf.

Today, the American military is the only one in the world that can steam, fly, and deploy globally. It is the only military that has truly global logistics, infrastructure, communications, transportation, and intelligence. It has more ships than any country, more tanks, more aircraft, more military transportation, and refueling capability. No other country, not even China, attempts to build such a global force.

Nor is it a "worn out" force. Gen. Peter Chiarelli, Army vice chief of staff, was asked in July what it would take to return to the 2001 level of military readiness and he told the truth: Ten years of fighting "gives you a level of readiness … that has never been as high as it is today. … We never want to go back."

[See photos of U.S. troops in Afghanistan.]

Nor is it burdened with worn-out equipment that now needs to be repaired. At a cost of $1 trillion over the past 10 years, we have completely upgraded all the Army's vehicles, bought more ammunition than we expected, acquired a whole new fleet of F-22s and C-17 cargo aircraft for the Air Force, and a lot of new naval vessels.

Today we have a big security problem: a deep economic recession combined with a yawning federal deficit. Our national debt, as the recently retired chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. Mike Mullen, has said, is "the most significant threat to our national security."

It is time to discipline defense, along with the rest of the federal budget, and target tax and spending policies for an economic recovery. The defense budget has more than doubled over the past decade, rising to constant-dollar levels unprecedented, in peace or war, since 1945. This surge of funds meant, as Admiral Mullen put it in January 2011, that the Defense Department "lost our ability to prioritize, to make hard decisions, to do tough analysis, to make trades."

Now it is time to restore order at the department and bring defense budgets back into line. There are lots of good ideas about how to do that, sensible ideas that do not "hollow out" the military. At this moment of transition out of Iraq, we need to re-look at how we use the military. We should not be asking the military to "do more with less," we should be asking them to do less with less, to set mission priorities in a safer world.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the budget and deficit.]

The challenge is doing a build-down right. We have done three of them since the end of the Korean War and we have not "gotten them wrong." The build-down of the 1990s left in place a force that used Saddam Hussein as a speed bump in 2003.

If the Defense Department's projected plan for the next 10 years were lowered by $1 trillion, that would be a 17 percent reduction in resources, pretty modest as defense build-downs go. The last three build-downs have lowered defense budgets 30 percent in constant dollars.

It is time to stop whining and get down to business. An orderly build-down would be good for the nation, for a disciplined Defense Department, for the budget, and for the economy. And it would leave in place a globally dominant, streamlined military, plenty capable of serving the nation's security needs.

Tags:
deficit and national debt,
defense spending,
Department of Defense
Other Arguments
#1

Yes — Reducing the military budget means less war, not more

PATRICK TAKAHASHI, Director Emeritus at the University of Hawaii

#2

Yes — Reductions should be a gradual process led by the military braintrust

TRAVIS SHARP, Bacevich Fellow at the Center for a New American Security

#3

Yes — By limiting expenditures, U.S. can actually solidify its defense

RON PAUL, U.S. Representative and Republican Candidate for President

#4
#5

Yes — Cuts may be necessary, but don't shift the entire burden to the military

KORI SCHAKE, Bradley Professor of International Security Studies at the United States Military Academy at West Point, N.Y.

#7

No — The solution to the debt crisis lies in entitlements and taxes, not the military budget

DOUG BERENSON, Director of the Defense & Aerospace Group at Avascent Group

#8
#9

No — The consequences of cutting the military budget are still not understood

J. RANDY FORBES, U.S. Representative and Chairman of the House Armed Services Readiness Subcommittee

Reader Comments

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.
About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.


Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.


You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Donald Trump Makes Kim Kardashian Look Good

At least Kim Kardashian doesn't take herself seriously.

The Vietnam War Still Haunts Us

History rhymes once again, thanks so much.

'Transcripters' Make Birthers Look Smart

Now the fringe right wants the president's university grades to prove he wasn't a good student.

Obama Must Do More to Protect the Intellectual Property Industry

The Obama administration needs to protect the industry's creativity and innovation.

Is Congress Getting Dumber?

That Congress is speaking at a lower grade level than it was seven years ago may be due to the unfortunate tendency to equate education with elitism.

Obama's Remarkable Silence on Latin American Press Abuses

President Obama's silence on press freedom in Latin America is troubling.

Why the Media Is Giving Romney a Pass on Trump's Birtherism

Why the media hasn't pressed Mitt Romney about Donald Trump's birther fantasies.

Romney's Bain Experience Wasn't Real American Capitalism

The fact that Bain Capital served to make money for investors, not to create jobs, could endanger Romney.

Advertisement