Are Cuts to the Defense Budget Necessary? >
Cutting Back on Defense Spending Will Make the World Safer
Reducing the military budget means less war, not more
November 21, 2011
About Patrick Takahashi:
Patrick Takahashi is director emeritus at the University of Hawaii and has served as a full professor of engineering, director of the Hawaii Natural Energy Institute, and vice president of development for the Pacific International Center for High Technology Research.
I've had several postings on defense spending and the national deficit over the past few years in the Huffington Post, so let me start with a two by four statement that the simple solution to our deficit problem should be to increase it. That said, we nevertheless have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to switch spending for defense to more sensible priorities, such as the amelioration of peak oil and global warming, while optimizing educational, public infrastructure, and environmental needs. Except for a few politically necessary expendables, however, the military-industrial complex will prevent what should be a slam dunk obvious answer.
[See a collection of political cartoons on the budget and deficit]
Part of the problem, also, is us. I've long wondered why the American public mostly encouraged this spending insanity at a time when we have no enemy. But this is a group where 82 percent believe in some kind of afterlife (much less in most developed countries ) and where only three years ago three-fourths of Republicans believed in global warming, but today only a tad more than half do. Thus, compelling logic is meaningless in this analysis.
Our only fear should be China (Russia was a real threat as part of the Soviet Union, but will only decay over time), for it only spends one sixth what we do on war. On a per-capita basis, this is 1/25th the amount.
Oh, those Middle East terrorists? There are only a few thousand really bad ones. Let them fight among themselves and do everything possible to minimize those almost expected acts of terrorism to come. But taking over the world? No.
In my original HuffPo piece, "Well, Barack, We Have a Problem..., "I suggested that President Barack Obama go to the next G8 summit and pronounce a Gorbachev-like bombshell: America will reduce defense spending by 10 percent this coming year, and will continue to slice 10 percent every year if you all do the same. In just a very few years, military spending will be minimal and the world will be at a higher level of peace forever.
[See photos of U.S. troops in Afghanistan.]
This is the 10 percent simple solution to peace. Before you make any inane comments, click on my various postings to appreciate that Russia is getting feeble, and China will also become old before it gets rich. The United States will be supreme for a long time to come, and those war funds can better be applied to help our country, cure planet earth, and enhance the fate of humanity.
Oh, while our president totally ignored my 2008 advice, he has another chance. He personally hosts the 2012 G8 Summit to be held in Chicago. Only so fair, as he just greeted the APEC (Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation) gathering in Honolulu (he calls both cities home). What are the odds for him to embrace the 10 percent solution for world peace forever? I'm afraid I answered that question in the first paragraph.
- See a slide show of 6 vulnerable potential terrorist targets.
- Check out our editorial cartoons on Afghanistan.
- See photos of the prison at Guantánamo Bay.
- Other Arguments
-
#25824
Yes — Reductions should be a gradual process led by the military braintrust
TRAVIS SHARP, Bacevich Fellow at the Center for a New American Security
-
#36230
Yes — By limiting expenditures, U.S. can actually solidify its defense
RON PAUL, U.S. Representative and Republican Candidate for President
-
#43119
Yes — Military must play its part here to halt the deficit threat too
LAWRENCE J. KORB, Former Assistant Secretary of Defense
-
#52819
Yes — Cuts may be necessary, but don't shift the entire burden to the military
KORI SCHAKE, Bradley Professor of International Security Studies at the United States Military Academy at West Point, N.Y.
-
#62023
Yes — Restore order at the department and bring defense budgets back into line
GORDON ADAMS, Professor at American University
-
#72642
No — The solution to the debt crisis lies in entitlements and taxes, not the military budget
DOUG BERENSON, Director of the Defense & Aerospace Group at Avascent Group
-
#81843
No — Defense budget is not large enough to cover president's foreign policy agenda
MACKENZIE EAGLEN, Fellow at the Heritage Foundation
-
#91542
No — The consequences of cutting the military budget are still not understood
J. RANDY FORBES, U.S. Representative and Chairman of the House Armed Services Readiness Subcommittee
Reader Comments Read all comments (6)
Patrick Takahashi of HI 12:01PM November 22, 2011
Howard Lee of HI 6:08PM November 21, 2011
Carl Weinberg of CA 4:25PM November 21, 2011