Debate Club

10 Years Later, Was the Iraq War Worth It? >

We Won the Iraq War Before We Lost It

The U.S. had justification to start the Iraq War, but we squandered our gains

March 20, 2013

About James Jay Carafano:

James Jay Carafano directs Heritage's Douglas and Sarah Allison Center for Foreign Policy Studies. Carafano is a 25-year veteran of the Army and his most recent book Private Sector/Public Wars: Contracting in Combat-Iraq, Afghanistan and Future Conflicts is a rigorous study of contractors' role on the battlefield and their impact on military effectiveness and civil society.

Following World War II, half of Europe fell under the iron grip of Stalin. Those nations remained captured for decades. Whole generations were lost to freedom. America spent untold wealth fighting the Cold War and risked global nuclear devastation. If 10 years after, America's newspapers had asked "Was WWII worth it?", most Americans would have shriveled their brow in confusion.

Perhaps the greatest generation was also a smarter generation. They knew there are no do-overs in national security. The worth of war can only be justly determined before the conflict is joined, not after. Asking if wars are worth it after the fact is the equivalent of Machiavellian morals in foreign policy—asserting that the "ends justify the means." In other words, if we don't like the outcome, it wasn't worth it.

[See a collection of political cartoons on defense spending.]

Nations should go to war only for a just cause and when they believe the good they hope to achieve will be outweighed by the terrors of combat and the inevitable suffering of innocents.

In the case of Iraq, the U.S. had more than enough justification to take on Saddam Hussein. He was a vicious dictator who inflicted unprecedented violence on his nation and the cause of peace and freedom. He demonstrably violated the peace accords that had led to the cessation of hostilities during the first Gulf War. Further, he had led an active and successful disinformation campaign to convince his neighbors that he had active WMD programs, even as he publically denied the charge.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the Middle East.]

Yes, the war and the aftermath were unpredicted, and were longer and more complicated than first thought. So was the American Revolution, WWII and Korea. Yet it is only Vietnam and now the Iraq War that pop culture wants to call "bad" wars.

If there is a similarity to the two, and a difference with the others, they were both wars we won before we lost. In both cases, after trial and error, we achieved a decent result and then Washington, tired of war, walked away—not only squandering hard won gains, but leaving the U.S. in a poorer strategic position than when we started.

Tags:
terrorism,
nuclear weapons,
Saddam Hussein,
Department of Defense,
Iraq war (2003-2011)
Other Arguments
#1

No — Getting rid of Sadam Hussein doesn't justify the costs of the war

PETER JUUL, Policy Analyst at the Center for American Progress

#2

No — Iraq was irrelevant to the decimation of al-Qaida

CHRISTOPHER PREBLE, Vice President for Foreign Policy Studies at the Cato Institute

#3

No — The Iraq War set the stage for the emergence of al-Qaida

JESSICA STERN, Fellow at the FXB Center for Human Rights at the Harvard School of Public Health

#4

No — Iraq: A huge un-forced error

JACOB STOKES, Research Associate at the Center for a New American Security

#5

Yes — Allowing Saddam Hussein to remain would have had a greater cost than the Iraq War

EVAN MOORE, Senior Policy Analyst for the Foreign Policy Initiative

#7

No — Don't criticize Bush, criticize the war's poor military planning

MICHAEL O'HANLON, Senior Fellow and Director of Research for the 21st Century Defense Initiative at the Brookings Institution

Reader Comments ()

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
President Obama's Code Pink Heckler Medea Benjamin Was Plain Rude

It's become acceptable for people to interrupt the president while he is delivering a formal speech on a deadly serious topic.

Obama Commerce Nominee Penny Pritzker’s Tax Problem

Obama’s Commerce Department nominee has some Romney-esque tax issues.

Oklahoma Tornado Reminds Us of the Value of Teachers

The Oklahoma tornado reminds us of all the roles teachers take on.

IRS, AP and James Rosen Scandals Strike at the First Amendment

The Obama scandals paint a picture of an administration at odds with the First Amendment.

Anthony Weiner Is Too Liberal to Be New York City Mayor

New York City doesn't need another Democratic mayor.

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

Advertisement