Debate Club

10 Years Later, Was the Iraq War Worth It? >

The Invasion of Iraq Was an Engine of Terrorist Growth

The Iraq War set the stage for the emergence of al-Qaida

March 20, 2013

About Jessica Stern:

Jessica Stern is a Fellow at the FXB Center for Human Rights at the Harvard School of Public Health, an Advanced Academic Candidate at the Massachusetts Institute of Psychoanalysis, and a member of Hoover Institution’s Task Force on National Security and Law. She is the author of several books on terrorism and numerous articles on terrorism and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.

By attacking Iraq rather than focusing on al-Qaida, we fell into our enemies' trap. The al-Qaida manual, "The Management of Savagery," prescribed forcing America "to abandon its war against Islam by proxy" by provoking it into a feckless military confrontation with a Muslim country with the goal of overextending America militarily, bleeding us financially, and exposing the hollowness of American values.

Many defense intellectuals who supported the war at the time now call the invasion a distraction from the war on terrorism. But the occupation of Iraq was much more than a distraction: it was an engine of terrorist growth. By going to war in Iraq, we set the stage for the emergence for an entirely new branch of al-Qaida—al-Qaida in Iraq. We thought we had mitigated its strength with the surge, and to some extent, we did. But now that US troops have left Iraq, the group that emerged in direct response to our occupation is resurgent, not just inside Iraq but as a regional movement, rebuilding its networks in Syria, Jordan, and Libya.

[See a collection of political cartoons on defense spending.]

The United States invaded Iraq with three stated goals: to disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction, to end Saddam Hussein's support for terrorism, and to free the Iraqi people. Within six weeks, Saddam's regime was deposed, no functional WMD had been found, and President Bush announced "mission accomplished." Like many leaders before him preparing to go to war, President Bush was optimistic about the prospect of victory. He persuaded himself and the U.S. Congress that the war in Iraq would be quick and cheap: approximately $50 to $60 billion to overthrow Saddam, reinstate order, and install a new government.

The actual costs of the war in Iraq include the deaths of 4488 U.S. military personnel and hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians. According to Brown University's Costs of War project, financial costs, including the cost to service the debt, will likely total nearly $4 trillion.

Tags:
Congress,
al Qaeda,
George W. Bush,
Saddam Hussein,
Iraq war (2003-2011)
Other Arguments
#1

No — Getting rid of Sadam Hussein doesn't justify the costs of the war

PETER JUUL, Policy Analyst at the Center for American Progress

#2

No — Iraq was irrelevant to the decimation of al-Qaida

CHRISTOPHER PREBLE, Vice President for Foreign Policy Studies at the Cato Institute

#4

No — Iraq: A huge un-forced error

JACOB STOKES, Research Associate at the Center for a New American Security

#5

Yes — Allowing Saddam Hussein to remain would have had a greater cost than the Iraq War

EVAN MOORE, Senior Policy Analyst for the Foreign Policy Initiative

#6

Yes — The U.S. had justification to start the Iraq War, but we squandered our gains

JAMES JAY CARAFANO, Director of the Douglas and Sarah Allison Center for Foreign Policy Studies at the Heritage Foundation

#7

No — Don't criticize Bush, criticize the war's poor military planning

MICHAEL O'HANLON, Senior Fellow and Director of Research for the 21st Century Defense Initiative at the Brookings Institution

Reader Comments ()

About Debate Club

A meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.

Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.

You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.

Advertisement
Cartoons
Thomas Jefferson Street Blog
Republicans Can't Forget the Economy During Obama Scandals

Scandals provide good fodder for the GOP, but it can't forget about fixing unemployment.

Amidst Obama Scandals, Republicans Prepare a New Debt Ceiling Hostage

Republicans are preparing to take the debt ceiling hostage…again.

Benghazi, IRS and AP Scandals Reveal a Clueless President

The recent slew of scandals reveals an administration either incompetent or malicious.

The IRS Scandal Is About Budget Cuts, Not the Tea Party

Cutting the tax collection budget hurts everyone in the long-run.

Obama 'Going Bulworth' Wouldn't Give Him Power Over Republicans

Both Congress and presidents overestimate the power of the Oval Office.

Bureaucracy Keeps Adopted Children Stuck in International Limbo

The U.S. needs to do more to ease the international adoption process.

The Real Scandal Behind the Benghazi Emails and Attacks

The GOP focuses on talking points while ignoring dangerous security budget cuts.

House Republicans Waste Time With Obamacare Repeal Vote

Why is the House bothering to repeal Obamacare yet again?

Advertisement