Maybe a Cheap Lunch is Okay for Congress
Democrats and Republicans think that Congress might have gone too far in barring lobbyists from opening their wallets at the local McDonald's or Quiznos. We hear that both sides are starting talks about allowing lobbyists to buy staff aides or members a cheap sandwich or drink, reversing course from the total ban recently enacted. Under consideration: letting lawmakers and aides receive a snack worth $10. A $50 annual cap would be placed on spending per lawmaker or top aide by a lobbyist. Why? Lawmakers actually rely on info from lobbyists, but the new rules have K Street afraid of getting too close to policymakers. While it would be a major compromise of the 2007 gift and meal ban, the limit is still a far cry from the previous $50-per-meal cap.
Tags: Congress
Tools:
Share
|
| Comments (2) | Print
Reader Comments
Keep the wallet in the pocket
If senators and representatives rely on the information provided by lobbyists, then have the congressmen buy the lobbyists lunch, instead.
But under no circumstances should a lobbyist be allowed to offer any monies, services or other thing which has the appearance of 'buying' a vote.
Were it up to me, I'd have all lobbyists rounded up and dumped naked in the arctic during winter. In theory, at least, they generate enough hot air to keep themselves alive indefinitely, but will probably contribute to global warming.
No they didn't
If a Senator or Rep can NOT buy their own lunch at a McDonalds, that is their problem.
ALL LOBBYISTS SHOULD BE OUTLAWED
advertisement




