Shedding Light on a Cause of Breast Cancer
Brightly lit communities have high rates of breast cancer, according to a new study of cancer data and satellite images of light pollution. (NASA/GSFC/Craig Mayhew and Robert Simmon)
When Edison invented the light bulb, did he accidentally spawn a cancer epidemic? It's certainly starting to look that way. In study after recent study, exposure to artificial light has been linked to certain kinds of tumors, especially those in the breast.
Consider some of the evidence: Blind women have low rates of breast cancer. So do women in underdeveloped countries, where artificial lighting is an uncommon luxury. By contrast, female nurses and other women who frequently work night shifts have high breast cancer rates. The reason, experts believe, is that their schedules expose them to illumination during what should be the darkest hours of their days, and that disrupts the body's production of the cancer-suppressing hormone melatonin. In lab experiments, human breast tumors have been found to grow relatively quickly when fed by the blood of women who have been in a brightly lit room in the middle of the night. When blood is drawn from women who've been sitting in darkness, it's richer in melatonin and less nourishing to the cancer.
Based on those and other observations, a unit of the World Health Organization announced in December that shift work is a "probable human carcinogen." But shift work may be merely the tip of Edison's epidemic.
In fact, any woman whose community is filled with streetlamps and other light sources may face an unnaturally high risk of breast cancer. A new study, slated to appear in the journal Chronobiology International, finds that breast cancer incidence is about 73 percent higher in communities with the greatest amount of artificial light at night than in communities with the least. The researchers assessed different communities' nocturnal light levels by analyzing satellite images of how much illumination escapes into space. (You can see this Washington Post article for details.)
Light pollution seems to have other untoward consequences, including harmful effects on animals like migratory birds and sea turtles. But the apparently carcinogenic effects of light pollution have received—and arguably deserve—the lion's share of scientists' attention. No one has paid more notice to the light-cancer connection than Richard Stevens, the University of Connecticut Health Center epidemiologist who first proposed a possible link more than two decades ago. Stevens collaborated on the new study with four colleagues in Israel, and I asked him to comment on its significance.
He was quick to say that the study falls short of proving cause and effect. But it's consistent, he said, with the hypothesis that light at night accounts for a "substantial fraction of breast cancer."
"Lighting the night is as important an ecological issue for the planet as global warming," he added. "In addition to its effects on all life forms, unnecessary lighting of the night accounts for a lot of fossil fuel consumption and also contributes to global warming."
Tags: breast cancer | cancer | pollution | light pollution | artificial light
Tools: 
Share
|
| Comments (23) | Print
Reader Comments
From a breast cancer survivor
I've have two breast cancer surgeries - 2003 and 2007 - with chemotherapy each time. I've also had two brain tumor surgeries - 1990 (23-hour craniotomy) and 2001 (Gamma-knife Radiosurgery.)
None of my other 5 (older) siblings has had cancer. My mother had non-Hodgkin's lymphoma when she's 73 and she's a healthy 86-year-old at the present.
Becuase I was born premature, I suspected the heat lamp that had kept me warm in the neonatal ICU might have had something to do with my brain tumor. DDT was probably another culprit since it was heavily applied at home when I was little. The evening routine was to close all the windows and doors and sprayed the chemical fume then went out for an evening walk.
I have always been a night owl - mainly because of the brain tumor - since I was young because the cranial pressure made me
feel tired easily. Most of my studings was done lying in bed late at night - one major reason why I became a librarian.
The air pollution (I grew up overseas in a very polluted city) and other carcinogens (worked one year in a classroom that had asbestos inside of the leaking ceilings before my breast cancer recurrence; worked one year beneath a library roof that was repaired with 'tar'-smelling material before my brain tumor recurrence ) probably all have someting to do with my cancer.
But the most important factor is my gene. One of my neurosurgeons told me that 'people who have one type of cancer tend to have another type of cancer'.
Half a century post the publication of 'The silent spring', our society has just started to pay attention to 'recycling' and other 'green' initiative. I hope the future generation will enjoy a better, cleaner environment.
light contributing factor to ^ in breast cancaer
As a night-shift nurse for >30 years, I thought all the nurses
around me were getting cancer from monitors leaking radiation.
I have always thought fluorescent lighting was harmful (read that it flickers so fast that we don't notice it). But not only have I seen several of my female co-workers suffer from breast cancer but bone cancer as well.
Too many variables
Of course, places with the most illumination are also going to be places most highly developed and have inherently less healthful environments. Living in a remote jungle might be fraught with danger, but you are less likely to die of diabetes or heart disease. But turn off the lights, anyway, please.
advertisement
