Another Rangel Property Scandal?
Already facing questions about one sweetheart property deal, New York Rep. Charlie Rangel now finds himself in another property brouhaha. The longtime Democratic congressman from Harlem has failed to report at least $75,000 in rental income from a luxury beachfront villa he owns in the Dominican Republic.
Evidently this is because Rangel, chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee and the chief tax writer for the United States, doesn't know that money derived from an asset is called "income." Here's how the New York Times described what his lawyer, Lanny Davis, had to say:
"Mr. Davis said the congressman did not realize he had to declare the money as income, and was unaware of the semiannual payments from the resort because his wife, Alma, handled the family finances and conferred with their accountant, John Viardi, on tax matters.
"The money was never sent to the Rangels directly, according to Mr. Davis and resort records, but was used to defray the mortgage the company gave them when they bought the villa and $23,000 in subsequent construction costs in 2003."
None of this passes the smell test. For starters, Rangel was aware he had to declare the money as income—he did so routinely in Schedule III filings in his financial disclosure statements to Congress. What's more, while Davis alleges the income was never sent to Rangel "directly" but instead was "used to defray the mortgage," those same disclosure forms show Rangel stopped listing the Punta Cana mortgage as a liability in 2003.
But here's the kicker: According to Rangel's financial forms, the Punta Cana property represents his single largest asset. Are we really to believe that the top tax-law writer in Congress, in his late 70s and surely approaching retirement, never took an interest in its performance?
Rangel has longstanding ties to the resort's owner, Theodore Kheel, so it's unlikely he just forgot about the property. Since 1993, Kheel and his late wife, Ann, contributed at least $69,469 to Rangel's campaign committees. What's more, in 2005, Rangel began listing himself as a board member to the Ann S. Kheel Charitable Trust, a foundation established by Kheel after his wife passed away. So far, the trust's largest reported donation has been to the City College of New York—$440,000 for the future Charles B. Rangel Center for Public Service.
This one stinks. Either Rangel evaded paying taxes, or—as his lawyer alleges—he doesn't even know the basics of the tax system over which he presides.
Tags: taxes | Charles Rangel
Tools:
Share
|
| Comments (10) | Print
Reader Comments
Rangel and outsourcing
Political policies have resulted in a lot of industry outsourcing jobs. Our government outsources a lot of work. I think the people aught to consider outsouring many political jobs.
Some CPA firms already outsource the preparation of our tax returns. Who needs Charles Rangel? I say fire Rangel and outsource Rangel's job. We don't need politicians who serve themselves.
We can get a better deal turning over many of our government functions -- especially tax -- to other countries that demonstrate that they are doing a better job.
Adam Clayton Powell
Representation from Harlem always has seemed like of and for the representative, as Adam Clayton Powell reminded us when he convinced his constituents to send him back to an ousted House. Seems like Rangel found himself caught with his hand in the cookie jar. Now here comes the shuck and jive.
Best Editorial on Rangel Beach Property
Sam Dealey's editorial on Charlie Rangel's property on the beach in the Dominican Republic is the best I have read. While the mainline news media would like to forget about this Charlie Rangel scandal, it should be headline news. Charlie Rangel should know the tax code like the back of his hand, and if he doesn't, then he should not be Chairman of the House Ways & Means Committee. This guy helps formulate tax code for the I.R.S. and doesn't know income when he sees it. Of course, Lanny Davis(Is He a Tax Attorney?), trying to help cover it up with the comments on it wouldn't affect his Federal tax liability anyway because of depreciation, is playing the American public for fools. If Charlie Rangel was getting an interest free loan, than the adjusted basis of the beach property should have been written down to zero by 2002 with the income being reported every year, and every cent would have been taxable after 2002 because there would have been nothing left to depreciate. If Charlie Rangel doesn't owe tax for at least the last 6 years on the beach property, then I guess the tax code is only for the working class, and rich Democrats are excluded from I.R.S rules.
Add your thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.advertisement


