Thursday, November 26, 2009

Opinion

Sam Dealey

Liberals Wrong About Cindy McCain's POW Experience and PTSD

October 14, 2008 04:05 PM ET | Sam Dealey | Permanent Link | Print

The latest issue of Marie Claire magazine carries an interview I had with Cindy McCain, and left-wing commentators are having a field day over comments she made about her husband's POW experience. MSNBC's Keith Olbermann was particularly exercised, calling McCain's comments "a mendacious attack on the troops" and "callous."

So what was her offensive comment? Here's the interview transcript:

MC: You met your husband after his POW days. To what extent is that still with youor is it a part of history?
CM: My husband will be the first one to tell you that that's in the past. Certainly it's a part of who he is, but he doesn't dwell on it. It's not part of a daily experience that we experience or anything like that. But it has shaped him. It has made him the leader that he is.

MC: But no cold sweats in the middle of the night?
CM: Oh, no, no, no, no, no. My husband, he'd be the first one to tell you that he was trained to do what he was doing. The guys who had the trouble were the 18-year-olds who were drafted. He was trained, he went to the Naval Academy, he was a trained United States naval officer, and so he knew what he was doing.

Sorry, but I fail to see how this disparages soldiers or makes light of post-traumatic stress syndrome.

Is it really that far-out to suggest that a gung-ho fighter pilot might be more mentally prepared for war's uglinesses than soldiers who were drafted?

Before complicating his rant by interviewing a liberal veteran, Olbermann himself acknowledged as much: "Even if we grant some element of truth here—that training might mitigate psychological impacts of injuries and combat experience and captivity—what should we make of Mrs. McCain's statement there?"

My suggestion: that there's some element of truth there.

Tags: POWs | presidential election 2008 | veterans | military | Vietnam War | Cindy McCain

Tools: Share | | Comments (16) | Print

Reader Comments

Cindy McCain/PTSD

It's obvious Sam you don't suffer from PTSD or even know someone that suffers from PTSD. Cindy McCains statement is an afront to all veterans and speaks to the lack of knowledge and compassion to those that are afflicted by the Republican party in general. McCain has voted against veterans programs, with Bush, while claiming great affection for the troops to the public to bolister is public image.As a Vietnam vet that has endured decades of nightmares, cold sweats, trust issues and so on as well as my physical injuries I take this issue very seriously. McCain is so out of touch with real people and real combat veterans it's hard to beleive he has garnered any support.It's only the dirty tactics of the Republician Party that were used by Bush that have kept him in the race this far. America is tired of these tactics and he will lose because he has discarded his honor to win at any cost.

Anything that McCain says will be ridiculed

Did anyone notice Obama's response when Bob Scheffer asked him last night about his negative ads? He was SMUG! Smug grin, smirk even, then 'well, this is politics after all..'

Then when John McCain said that his feelings were hurt that he was compared to Geo. Wallace, Obama derided him as the bully that he is about his 'hurt feelings.'

Why, oh why, would Mrs. McCain admit to one tiny thing about her husband's private mental health? So the liberal media would/could find some way to better belittle him?

Double standards being so accepted at this time, Mrs. McCain did what any wife would do; she protected her husband.

Cindy McCain is clueless

My husband is a Viet Nam Vet and has PTSD. I believe from reading I have done about Sen McCain that he had issues long before he went to Viet Nam. Anger management issues. Now I believe he has PTSD as well. My husband has it, I know the signs and if Cindy would like to deny it in her husband that is her choice. Being in denial isn't going to make this go away. Maybe that is why Cindy did drugs. Who knows?? But I do know that hiding from it, or doing drugs doesn't change the facts.

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

Sam Dealey is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report and Reader's Digest. He has written for many publications, including Time, GQ, the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

Thomas Jefferson St.

GOP Can Be Thankful for Strong Polls

But they cannot get complacent.

5 Reasons for a Democratic Thanksgiving

Michael Steele and healthcare reform top the list.

Women Have Say on Health Reform

If it's the year of the women, why are there so few of them?

Turkey Tax

Uncle Sam is joining in on your Thanksgiving dinner.

Ideological Labels Just Don't Fit

Hard-liners don't understand that some of us don't toe an ideological line.

A Decade in Biased Review

How well does the video sum up the last decade?

GOPers Push European-Style Litmus Tests

Some RNC members want strict party platforms. Why do they hate America?

advertisement

People who read this also read ...

Public Opinion

Should the GOP Have a Litmus Test?

Should the RNC exclude politicians who don't match the party's platform?

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.