Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Opinion

Sam Dealey

Nancy Pelosi's Financial Crisis Bailout Partisan Train Wreck

September 29, 2008 06:05 PM ET | Sam Dealey | Permanent Link | Print

So the $700 billion bailout is off the table for now, as 95 Democrats and 135 Republicans in the House surprised everyone and defied what looked like a fait accompli. The bill wasn't a perfect beast, and plenty of lawmakers on the right and left had signaled their substantive opposition before the vote. Still, its passage seemed manageable. So what happened? A lot of fingers are pointing at House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, whose prevote speech was a galling display of partisan taunts rather than serious urgency.

Particularly inappropriate was her characterization of the Bush administration's "anything goes" economic policy, which supposedly resulted in the financial crisis. Here's how Pelosi summed it up: "No regulation, no supervision, no discipline. If you fail, you will have a golden parachute and the taxpayer will bail you out."

I'm hardly a defender of Team Bush's economic policy. It's been a schizophrenic hodgepodge of gross spending and highly specialized, inadequate tax cuts. But most reasonable people seem to agree that a big cause for our current predicament—certainly immediately, and many would argue structurally—was the collapse of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Back in 2003, Treasury Secretary John Snow tried to do something to reform these government-sponsored mortgage gamblers and was quickly rebuffed by Republicans and (mostly) Democrats in Congress. I've written a fair amount about this, but for a fine display of how Congress acted then, check out this short YouTube clip of a congressional hearing. (Yes, it's overly rah-rah Republican, but not by much.) And when you're done, think again about Pelosi's comments about "no regulation, no supervision, no discipline."

Pelosi's catastrophic handling of the House so far has been one of the few bright points for conservatives in Washington—with her in charge, neither the Republicans nor the Democrats in Congress have managed to muck up things too much. Today, she proved again why she's her opponents' most dependable friend.

Tags: economics | House of Representatives | Nancy Pelosi

Tools: Share | | Comments (92) | Print

advertisement

Sam Dealey is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report and Reader's Digest. He has written for many publications, including Time, GQ, the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

Thomas Jefferson St.

Ideological Labels Just Don't Fit

Hard-liners don't understand that some of us don't toe an ideological line.

A Decade in Biased Review

How well does the video sum up the last decade?

GOPers Push European-Style Litmus Tests

Some RNC members want strict party platforms. Why do they hate America?

Can Conservative Carly Fiorina Carry Cali?

Ronald Reagan's state is now one of the most liberal in the nation.

Opinions Clash on Wars in Iran, Afghanistan

Fewer favor the effort in Afghanistan, support rises for hostilities against Iran's nuclear program.

Bennet's Senate Seat Is Already at Risk

His vote on healthcare would be less a case of political martyrdom than it may seem.

Bush Airport Reflects Its Namesake

Could Houston's Bush Intercontinental airport be number one because of its name?

Colorado May Tax Medical Marijuana

Remember the old saying about how if pot could be taxed, it would become legal?

advertisement

People who read this also read ...

Public Opinion

Should the GOP Have a Litmus Test?

Should the RNC exclude politicians who don't match the party's platform?

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.