Saturday, November 28, 2009

Opinion

Sam Dealey

Mexico, Colombia, and Why Afghanistan Should Follow Their Lead Dealing With Drugs

September 25, 2008 11:22 AM ET | Sam Dealey | Permanent Link | Print

Yesterday, a New York jury convicted a major Afghan drug lord on two counts of heroin distribution. Nearly six years after the invasion of Afghanistan, the verdicts against Bashir Noorzai represent the first high-level convictions of an Afghan opium lord. And while the case is an individual success, it is also a reminder of how ineffective U.S. counternarcotics policy is in Afghanistan.

When I was in Afghanistan two years ago writing on the drug trade, a senior U.S. counternarcotics official faced no illusions that high-level convictions were needed soon. With the Taliban, powerful businessmen, and high-level politicians all in the drug trade together, the country was dangerously close to becoming a narco-state. As both a symptom and a cause of this, Afghanistan's traditional courts were useless, and the Justice Department and allied governments set about establishing separate courts for drug offenders. The idea was to make this special drug court a rule-of-law bastion whose best practices would bleed into other areas of justice and law enforcement. Scads of money were spent building new trial and prison facilities and training Afghan judges.

So far, the courts have been disastrous. Low-level functionaries may or may not be pursued and punished, but anyone of any importance gets off scot-free. In addition to further hobbling the central government and the war, this social laboratory experiment has only reinforced the (correct) impression among ordinary Afghans that justice is blind in only one eye.

Far more successful have been the examples of Colombia and Mexico. Both are well-established democracies whose governments recognize that their courts can't withstand a drug-lord defendant with millions of dollars at his disposal and have extradited hundreds of their own Bashir Noorzais to face trial in the United States.

Does this mean that the drug business has been shut down in these countries? Of course not. But strong extradition treaties have severely disrupted these drug trades, and it's safe to say that, as bad as the problem now is in these countries, it could be much worse. So, while it's good that Noorzai represents the first Afghan drug lord to go to a U.S. prison, it will be a disaster if he is not joined by many more soon.

Tags: Afghanistan | Colombia | Mexico | drugs

Tools: Share | | Comments (3) | Print

Reader Comments

Mexicos sucess in the drug war

Man if you thin kmexico is a success you should have been in my truck in Sonoyta on Nov.31st as the narcos fired automatic weapons in the center of sonoyta killing the head of the AFI ,2 local cops and a waitress. 5000 dead last year.You free market shitheads should know the only way to stop this is to legalize all drugs.

demand is the problem

As long as the demand is high here in the US, the drugs will keep coming. Prohibition failed, and the drug war is failing just as miserably. As a sober member of AA, I see the addicts and alcoholics using the same 12 steps to overcome addiction. Alcohol is no better of a chioce and neither are cigarettes, than the highly illegal hard drugs. Both are legal. The illegality of drugs is the reason for the killing. The drug lords will get their drugs where the demand is high, at any cost,just like the man at the liquor store sells his booze and cigarettes. No killing , because they're legal.

Supply/Demand

Eliminate the demand and the supply will dry up on it's own.

Try with all resources possible and you will fail miserably as long as there is demand.

Not all demand can be eliminated, but the bulk of resources would be better spent in trying to eliminate demand and reducing it significantly--and then supply will trickle to barely enough to supply the continuing demand as profitability will be severely curtailed.

In places like Afganistan and Columbia drugs are a major source of their economy. They will continue to push sales all possible as long as there are willing buyers.

And sadly, U.S. children are a major market.

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

Sam Dealey is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report and Reader's Digest. He has written for many publications, including Time, GQ, the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

Thomas Jefferson St.

Thank You, Bob Dylan

He’s still touring around America like a rolling stone.

GOP Can Be Thankful for Strong Polls

But they cannot get complacent.

5 Reasons for a Democratic Thanksgiving

Michael Steele and healthcare reform top the list.

Women Have Say on Health Reform

If it's the year of the women, why are there so few of them?

Turkey Tax

Uncle Sam is joining in on your Thanksgiving dinner.

Ideological Labels Just Don't Fit

Hard-liners don't understand that some of us don't toe an ideological line.

A Decade in Biased Review

How well does the video sum up the last decade?

advertisement

People who read this also read ...

Public Opinion

Should the GOP Have a Litmus Test?

Should the RNC exclude politicians who don't match the party's platform?

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.