Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Opinion

Robert Schlesinger

D.C. Should Compromise With the NRA on Guns in Order to Secure Voting Rights

March 12, 2009 06:30 PM ET | Robert Schlesinger | Permanent Link | Print

By Robert Schlesinger, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

The excellent Washington Post columnist Marc Fisher writes in his column today that in order to secure their voting rights, D.C. pols should not fight the gun issue with Congress. I reluctantly conclude Fisher's correct.

He writes:

One thing should be clear after all these years: In any face-off between Congress and the District, the lords on the Hill win. They control the budget. They sign off on the laws. If they want to send the mayor back to the family shoe store, they could do so tomorrow. On this plantation, that's how it will always be.

So what's the District to do when Congress decides it might be fun to make voting rights for Washingtonians contingent on stripping the city of the power to regulate gun ownership?

If you ask D.C. politicians, the answer is to stamp their feet and insist on having it their own way.

Local politicians are risking the principle of congressional representation in order to stand on the principle of being able to make local decisions about gun control. Here's the thing: D.C.'s ability to make its own decisions regarding gun control is illusory. As Fisher notes, Congress can do whatever it damn well pleases.

So what we're talking about is risking congressional representation over a hollow battle.

Now the forces fighting for a D.C. vote have a choice: Insist on purity — a clean voting rights bill with no gun bits attached — and lose. Or cave to reality, knowing that a vote is forever, but gun policies will shift as popular attitudes evolve.

...

Congress will always conduct its little experiments on the District, so the city's belief that it can set its own course on guns is delusional. But it is possible to play politics and make some real progress. And a seat in the House is very real — a recognition, finally, that a vote is a basic right. It's a way to tell thousands of disillusioned, disenfranchised D.C. children that they really are citizens of the United States.

Fisher suggests some legislative compromises D.C. leaders could offer that might grease the wheels. They would be smart to read his column—better to compromise here than, as Reagan used to say, go "off the cliff with all flags flying."

On Facebook? You can keep up with Thomas Jefferson Street blog postings through Facebook's Networked Blogs.

Tags: NRA | guns | voting | Washington, DC

Tools: Share | | Comments (19) | Print

Reader Comments

Gun Control

To the Liberal Overlords:

Why can't we carry flame throwers? Those who outlaw flame throwers are against God. Oh, and Mom too! If you outlaw flame throwers only outlaws will throw flames.

Right now, the Armed Forces can carry flame throwers. What happens when they "turn"?? and you know what I mean.

How will we defend ourselves with our puny little .45's and .30-.30's.? Where are the flame thrower corporations in this? Bunch of girly men!

Write your congressmen. "Flames to the people!" shall be our cry.

Hypocritical Gun Control

Each of us owes our freedom to above average Americans with Faith in their hearts, Guns in their hands and the guts to step onto a battlefield to fight for freedom. All this to allow others to Denounce God, blame guns for the downfall of Society and seek to hand our freedoms over to the likes of the United Nations in order to "get along" with the rest of the World. When our worst fears happen and "Red Dawn" becomes a reality those are the same ones who will be looking for some "Gun toting Radical" to Pray with, be protected by and complain to about the loss of their rights. God,Guns and Guts isn't a phrase it's a way of life.

DC resists 2nd Amendment, again

Let's see if I get this straight. DC wants a new right that they don't have, but only if they can ignore a right that already exists? Wasn't the Bill of Rights created so that Government COULDN'T pick and choose who gets favors and to ensure all citizens get to exercise their rights? If DC's council has lost sight of this, do we really want them sending like-minded elitists to Congress to selectively represent their district? Maybe some more time on the sidelines is in order.

If people stop thinking like an elitist ("we know best for the little people") and start understanding the crime problem through the mind of a criminal ("this population has been disarmed for our convenience. What a victim-rich place to apply our criminal trade!"), then the solution will be readily at hand. If DC's law abiding citizens could carry a gun wherever they go, criminals would take the first bus to Bloomberg's town!

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Robert Schlesinger is a deputy editor at U.S. News and World Report and oversees all opinion editorial content. He is the author of White House Ghosts: Presidents and Their Speechwriters.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

People who read this also read ...

Thomas Jefferson St.

Turkey Tax

Uncle Sam is joining in on your Thanksgiving dinner.

Ideological Labels Just Don't Fit

Hard-liners don't understand that some of us don't toe an ideological line.

A Decade in Biased Review

How well does the video sum up the last decade?

GOPers Push European-Style Litmus Tests

Some RNC members want strict party platforms. Why do they hate America?

Can Conservative Carly Fiorina Carry Cali?

Ronald Reagan's state is now one of the most liberal in the nation.

Opinions Clash on Wars in Iran, Afghanistan

Fewer favor the effort in Afghanistan, support rises for hostilities against Iran's nuclear program.

Bennet's Senate Seat Is Already at Risk

His vote on healthcare would be less a case of political martyrdom than it may seem.

Bush Airport Reflects Its Namesake

Could Houston's Bush Intercontinental airport be number one because of its name?

Cartoon Gallery

Editorial Cartoon

Political Cartoons

Check out our most recent cartoons.

Public Opinion

Should the GOP Have a Litmus Test?

Should the RNC exclude politicians who don't match the party's platform?

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.