Time to End the Filibuster By Making It Real
By Robert Schlesinger, Thomas Jefferson Street blog
Is it time to eliminate the filibuster? Definitely not. But David RePass, an emeritus professor of political science at the University of Connecticut, has an interesting suggestion in today's New York Times along those lines but distinctly short of it.
Robert's 8th Rule of Politics tells us that parties in power rarely give much thought to how their power grabs might redound upon them when they are out of power. Pols forget that one day they will be in the minority and the powers they've been expanding could be turned upon them. It would not be a surprise for Democrats to want to eliminate the filibuster, regardless of the long-term consequences.
RePass bemoans the fact that the filibuster has given the senate's minority party a functional veto over legislation in that chamber by requiring at least 60 votes to pass something. But, he points out, real filibusters never actually happen these days: the modern "filibuster" is more threat than action.
Which is where RePass' solution comes in:
... fixing the problem would not require any change in Senate rules. The phantom filibuster could be done away with overnight by the Senate majority leader, Harry Reid. All he needs to do is call the minority's bluff by bringing a challenged measure to the floor and letting the debate begin.
In other words, don't get rid of the filibuster. Instead make it real: Force Republicans to actually get up and tie up Senate business and explain why they're doing it. If the GOP (or the Democrats, in time, when they are back in the minority), want to filibuster they should be able to—but they should have to actually do it.
On Facebook? You can keep up with Thomas Jefferson Street blog postings through Facebook's Networked Blogs.
- Read more by Robert Schlesinger.
- Read more from the Thomas Jefferson Street blog.
- Read more about the Senate.
Tags: Senate
Tools:
Share
|
| Comments (5) | Print
Reader Comments
Btwjwuep
lTnGcr
What a surprise
Jeez, I'm just shocked that this opinion would come from such a valued member of academia. Chances are pretty good he's a liberal loon. 95% of em are. As already has been stated in the comment section, where were these suggestions....oh about 5 or 6 years ago. This kind of reminds me how there was so little mention (as wellas NO documentaries that I can find!!!) on voter fraud this past election. I guess all the kinks must have been worked out, huh? The amazing hypocrasy of the Lunatic Left!!
Filibuster
I agree. For the Dems to truly prove that this filibuster nonsense is an empty threat is put it to the test. Let them filibuster so that the people will know what kind of nonsense their supposed Republican (Lincoln must be turning in his grave right now) principles are.
Since when did a filibuster stop a majority party from moving forward its agenda ? Specially now, that the President received an overwhelming majority from the American people anyone who dares to filibuster will just appear silly and obstructionist. He/she cannot sustain it and my guess is majority of Reps will stay away from that kind of project.
All along, I have been saying in my blog, let them filibuster. Filibusters against a popular government will just make fools of themselves. That is the reality and the Dems will benefit from any filibuster. As for the filibusterer/s they ought to take a hard look at their Senate seat because they're bound to lose it.
jetguerrero.blogspot.com
advertisement




