Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Opinion

Robert Schlesinger

The Facebook Terms of Use Debate—We Care Because It's Social

February 19, 2009 04:15 PM ET | Robert Schlesinger | Permanent Link | Print

By Robert Schlesinger, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

I'm a reasonably engaged Facebook user: I update my status with regularity, have a few friends, and diligently maintain the Thomas Jefferson Street blog page (more than 100 readers signed on). But I was wholly unaware of the great Facebook Terms of Use debate until the evil corporation had surrendered.

I suspect part of the reason for that is identified by my friend Rob Pegoraro in his Washington Post tech column today:

... why would anybody pay more attention to Facebook's terms of service than to the other contracts we casually accept? Who reads the roughly 17,500-word "terms and conditions" contract governing Apple's iTunes Store before buying a song? Who digests Microsoft's nearly 5,500-word license for Windows Vista before booting up a new PC?

Who indeed? A sufficient number of Facebookers for a start. And of course the critical difference is that unlike iTunes, Vista, and that new PC, Facebook is an ostensibly social space. We live with (or more precisely, ignore) terms of use on appliances and furniture—whether DVD players or couches or operating systems. But if someone changes the way we can use a social space, or the consequences of it ... that's a different story.

With something like Facebook we have a great sense not only of control but of the right to control the rules by which the space is run.

By the way, on his blog, Rob links to an interesting blog post detailing the differences between the "new" (now repealed) Facebook terms of use and those of similar sites. The short story is that the "new" Facebook terms were as invasive as advertised, relatively speaking.

So what now? Facebook walked back its "new" terms and is promising to include users in the process of writing new rules through its "Bill of Rights and Responsibilities" group. Of course, the basic issue with the "new" rules related to lawyers running amok, so it will be, ahem, interesting to see how well the lawyers work in a crowdsourcing environment.

On Facebook? You can keep up with Thomas Jefferson Street blog postings through Facebook's Networked Blogs.

Tags: internet | Facebook | social networking

Tools: Share | | Comments (1) | Print

advertisement

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Robert Schlesinger is a deputy editor at U.S. News and World Report and oversees all opinion editorial content. He is the author of White House Ghosts: Presidents and Their Speechwriters.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

People who read this also read ...

Thomas Jefferson St.

GOP Can Be Thankful for Strong Polls

But they cannot get complacent.

5 Reasons for a Democratic Thanksgiving

Michael Steele and healthcare reform top the list.

Women Have Say on Health Reform

If it's the year of the women, why are there so few of them?

Turkey Tax

Uncle Sam is joining in on your Thanksgiving dinner.

Ideological Labels Just Don't Fit

Hard-liners don't understand that some of us don't toe an ideological line.

A Decade in Biased Review

How well does the video sum up the last decade?

GOPers Push European-Style Litmus Tests

Some RNC members want strict party platforms. Why do they hate America?

Cartoon Gallery

Editorial Cartoon

Political Cartoons

Check out our most recent cartoons.

Public Opinion

Should the GOP Have a Litmus Test?

Should the RNC exclude politicians who don't match the party's platform?

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.