Thursday, November 26, 2009

Opinion

Robert Schlesinger

Obama Looks Like Bush on National Security Secrecy Argument

February 10, 2009 01:54 PM ET | Robert Schlesinger | Permanent Link | Print

Bad news today for people who were hoping that Barack Obama would roll back some of the imperial executive which Bush, Cheney and their wacky legal theorists built over the last eight years. The new administration's lawyers picked up a questionable legal theory from the old administration, that national security trumps due process of law.

The issue came up Monday in a court case where five former detainees are suing for Boeing helping with the Bush administration's "extraordinary rendition" program. The Bush administration had argued that the case should be dismissed because, as today's New York Times puts it, "even discussing it in court could threaten national security and relations with other nations."

Candidate Obama was rather critical of extraordinary renditions. So the judges hearing the case on Monday were a bit taken aback when governmental lawyer Douglas Letter declined an opportunity to change the government's argument in the case.

The charitable interpretation here is: Obama and his aides don't want to appear dangerously hasty while dismantling the Bush national security apparatus. They're doing their due diligence before rolling some of this stuff back.

But then there's this, from the Times:

A Justice Department spokesman, Matt Miller, said the government did not comment on pending litigation, but he seemed to suggest that Mr. Obama would invoke the privilege more sparingly than its predecessor.

"It is the policy of this administration to invoke the state secrets privilege only when necessary and in the most appropriate cases," he said, adding that Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. had asked for a review of pending cases in which the government had previously asserted a state secret privilege.

I'm going to use these presidential powers less is a distinctly different thing than These "powers" were an over-reach and should be rolled back. Presidents don't as a rule relinquish powers grabbed by their predecessors, so it would not be a surprise if Obama and his team assume the first position. But it would be a disappointment.

On Facebook? You can keep up with Thomas Jefferson Street blog postings through Facebook's Networked Blogs.

Tags: national security | Obama administration

Tools: Share | | Comments (5) | Print

Reader Comments

please yourself

BLAH BLAH BLAH

Back it up?

Based on what? Your non informed elbow? I don't get it? How ....ya know what...I can't even say anything....Just look at our....chhhaaa

Its not even worth this many lines of type...but GET OVER YOURSELF AND LOOK AT NATIONAL SECURITY MONITORING WHAT I"M TYPING RIGHT NOW!

Excerising freedom of speech should not be monitored....how is that securing the innocent?

And wasn't it said "It is the policy of this administration to invoke the state secrets privilege only when necessary and in the most appropriate cases,"

That's not what the bush administration did

Yeah

I'd even say Obama is sticking to the Bush plan because BUSH made it critical to our national security. Anyone who thinks otherwise (like the first commenter) does not know how to think, plus it's obvious Rush Limbaugh thinks for him. If you don't know how to think, please don't vote!

please

get over yourself. He's sticking to the Bush plan because it was critical to our national security.

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Robert Schlesinger is a deputy editor at U.S. News and World Report and oversees all opinion editorial content. He is the author of White House Ghosts: Presidents and Their Speechwriters.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

People who read this also read ...

Thomas Jefferson St.

GOP Can Be Thankful for Strong Polls

But they cannot get complacent.

5 Reasons for a Democratic Thanksgiving

Michael Steele and healthcare reform top the list.

Women Have Say on Health Reform

If it's the year of the women, why are there so few of them?

Turkey Tax

Uncle Sam is joining in on your Thanksgiving dinner.

Ideological Labels Just Don't Fit

Hard-liners don't understand that some of us don't toe an ideological line.

A Decade in Biased Review

How well does the video sum up the last decade?

GOPers Push European-Style Litmus Tests

Some RNC members want strict party platforms. Why do they hate America?

Cartoon Gallery

Editorial Cartoon

Political Cartoons

Check out our most recent cartoons.

Public Opinion

Should the GOP Have a Litmus Test?

Should the RNC exclude politicians who don't match the party's platform?

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.