Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Opinion

Robert Schlesinger

Barack Obama and the Ex-Presidents

January 08, 2009 10:07 AM ET | Robert Schlesinger | Permanent Link | Print

Reader Comments

ROBERT

YOU NEED TO GO BACK TO SCHOOL

bush

BUSH IS THE GREATEST PRESIDENT WE HAVE HAD DOES THAT HURT YOU LIBS TO HERE THAT TOO BAD IT IS A FACT

B Gail of Il is clearly uninformed as to the underlying cause of the economic situation we're in. Either that or she's just ignorant and has failed do anything except spout off with the old (and getting older) refrain "It's Bush's fault".

This situation has nothing to do with Bush economic policy but has to do with a failure of the financial system to run normal checks and analysis on the loans that they gave out over the last 15 years because of implicit and explicit guarantees mandated by the federal government.

Beginning with Bill Clinton in 1996 and ending with Barney Frank and Chris Dodd last year, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae were obligated (to an ever increasing number), by the federal government to make more "affordable housing loans" . Now, neither institution actually wrote individual residential mortgages, but they did purchase the loans that had already been made and that had been packaged by other lenders, some of them unscrupulous, because both Freddie and Fannie HAD TO BUY THEM.

Knowing that Fannie and Freddie were obligated to buy so large a number of "affordable housing loans" (i.e. -loans made to non credit-worthy borrowers with no real ability to repay them), emboldened many lenders and allowed them the freedom of approving loans that they would never had made under normal circumstances, because the loans were implicitly guaranteed by the federal government through Fannie and Freddie.

With implicit government backing and so many unqualified borrowers buying houses the competition to write loans became greater and the standards for approving loans diminshed even farther. Money became cheaper and more available which lead to the real estate boon that drove housing prices up throughout the country from 1999-2006.

As housing values appreciated, people assumed that the equity that magically had appeared in their houses was never going to go away and so they borrowed money against their homes in the form of home equity loans and second mortgages. They went out, spent that money carelessly, assuming that their home values would only continue to rise. Unfortunately the bubble began to deflate as actual income failed to rise with increasing household debt and as people began to default on their payments -- credit cards, then home equity loans and then mortgages, the bubble finally burst; housing values began to decrease and suddenly the party was over.

Fannie and Freddie were at the core of the meltdown and led us into even deeper problems when the non-consumer credit markets froze (out of fear and a sudden interest in caution), after the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers, which the Fed should not have allowed to fail.

So B Gail of Illinois, ths was not Bush's fault as you have naively been led to believe. It is the fault of the government backers/protectors of Fannie and Freddie (Barney Frank, Chris Dodd and Barack Obama), and the basic greed of the general population. Obama cannot spend our way out of this.

I hardly ever read blogs. They are usually so negative. People can comment without being so viscious and tasteless. How can anyone take these type of comments seriously?

change brings out the cynics

I never cease to be amazed at how changing the status quo brings out the worse in those who have enjoyed the status quo. We are in the mess we're in because of the the dynasty of the Bushes, the reign of rich CEOs with their powerful lobbyists, and the complete and total apathy of the American people. Now we are something fresh and new: a "real" American in the most powerful position in this country, not some rich spoiled brat who even today, continues to do things his own way, a people energized by his leadership who are tuned in and ready to participate again (have any of us living seen it like this before?), a new leader who has the respect of the majority of this nation (huge change), and a world that is as excited about this change as many of us are.

I just look forward to those disappointed by the complete and utter failure of their champions to lead this country understanding that their new leader's success is their success as well. See, the rest of us understand that when our leader succeeds at making life better for the majority of the people, it's good for everyone. Your leaders only thought about their few, and if you'd admit it, you'd realize that most of your "group" lost as much as the rest of us during that past 8 years.

I hope that our adult population begins to act like grownups, stops spouting the propaganda of those who have used them to the detriment of our nation, and begins to contribute to the political process. When we turn from this dark time, not only will we be better off, but so will our children's children.

Comparing Obama to Monroe?

Again, some people are so swept up in Obamamania that they are ready to give him a stature he has not yet earned. He hasn't even taken office yet, much less accomplished anything other than getting elected.

BARAKS AND EX-PRESIDENTS

Yes, "God help us through this darkness." George Bush has left the country in total turmoil, so I pray that PE Obama has the wisdom and confidence to find ways for him and his team to lead us to the light.

If he is successful, so will all the American people.

'Of' is clearly easily impressed (not the least of which, with him/herself)...

Best to disregard the last two posts. Slaps from the disgruntled are wastes of your time.

I SEE YOUR POINT....

Standards have certainly fallen since the Founding Fathers left the political scene. That they continue to fall is borne out by Obama's election.

Bumblers all, now replaced by an egotistical, facile, glib messiah. May God help us through the coming darkness...

Add your thoughts

All comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.
U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Robert Schlesinger is a deputy editor at U.S. News and World Report and oversees all opinion editorial content. He is the author of White House Ghosts: Presidents and Their Speechwriters.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

People who read this also read ...

Thomas Jefferson St.

Turkey Tax

Uncle Sam is joining in on your Thanksgiving dinner.

Ideological Labels Just Don't Fit

Hard-liners don't understand that some of us don't toe an ideological line.

A Decade in Biased Review

How well does the video sum up the last decade?

GOPers Push European-Style Litmus Tests

Some RNC members want strict party platforms. Why do they hate America?

Can Conservative Carly Fiorina Carry Cali?

Ronald Reagan's state is now one of the most liberal in the nation.

Opinions Clash on Wars in Iran, Afghanistan

Fewer favor the effort in Afghanistan, support rises for hostilities against Iran's nuclear program.

Bennet's Senate Seat Is Already at Risk

His vote on healthcare would be less a case of political martyrdom than it may seem.

Bush Airport Reflects Its Namesake

Could Houston's Bush Intercontinental airport be number one because of its name?

Cartoon Gallery

Editorial Cartoon

Political Cartoons

Check out our most recent cartoons.

Public Opinion

Should the GOP Have a Litmus Test?

Should the RNC exclude politicians who don't match the party's platform?

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.