A Bailout for Small Business?
Yesterday the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. announced that it will take the biggest step any part of the federal government has taken to "bail out" small businesses in the wake of the financial crisis. Forbes reports:
The FDIC will also expand deposit insurance for non-interest-bearing transaction accounts used by many small businesses. Many businesses that had accounts larger than the Federal Deposit Insurance limit, currently $250,000, were pulling accounts from smaller banks and moving them to larger, safer banks. Under the new program, the FDIC will provide full insurance coverage for non-interest-bearing accounts until the end of next year. Banks will pay a new premium to cover the expense of the program.
What are these "non-interest-bearing accounts," and why do they matter so much for small businesses? The Jacksonville Business Journal explains:
These are mainly payment-processing accounts, such as payroll accounts used by businesses that often exceed the current maximum limit of $250,000. This new, temporary guarantee, which expires at the end of 2009, will help stabilize these accounts, FDIC said.
The move will be funded by fees on banks, not taxpayers. So is there any catch? The FDIC is not a magic wand that can make all problems go away. John Berlau of the Competitive Enterprise Institute has argued that increasing FDIC guarantees can have some bad consequences down the road:
But wasn't too much confidence in the banking system in large part what got us into this mess? Deposit insurance, even at current levels, encourages "moral hazard" as consumers assume their banks are totally safe and don't look for quality as they do with investments and so many other products.
Here Berlau is talking about raising the FDIC's cap on deposit insurance, but the same problem could apply to these new guarantees for non-interest-bearing accounts. On the other hand, the fact that this FDIC move is temporary and will expire at the end of 2009 should partially address that moral hazard concern.
Tags: FDIC | small business | banking
Tools: 
Share
|
| Comments (3) | Print
Reader Comments
Put a time limit on the FDIC increase to $250K
I agree with the moral hazard idea. Depositors with over $100,000 in the bank have the resources to scrutinize the banks and take their money elsewhere if they decide that their bank's behavior is too risky. I think the increase in deposit insurance to $250,000 should expire in 5 years or less to put a free-market check back on the banks after this crisis has passed.
bailout for small businesses
How the hell will this help bail out small businesses. Our customers stopped calling and coming in the store as soon as the President announced that our economy was going down the tubes. Give some money to the consumers, not the banks, credit card companies and certainly not the auto makers. What good does it do to give them money to keep people working and make more cars when people cannot afford to buy cars any longer?
Small Businesses with credit card woes
Small Businesses are getting hit from every direction. Their customers can't spend, they can't get loans, and if they use a credit card - small businesses are seeing the APR on those cards rocket up to over 30%.
There is no bailout for small businesses. Maybe the government should offer free legal services for bankruptcy filing.
I have no more notches on my belt to tighten.
Add your thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.advertisement
