What Does Drug Dealing Tell Us About Small Businesses?
Scott Shane just blogged about a fascinating study by Rob Fairlie, an economist at the University of California-Santa Cruz. Fairlie was interested in entrepreneurship in the black market and how it relates to legitimate entrepreneurship. So he looked at data regarding drug dealers, and he found that they were 10 to 11 percent more likely to become self-employed in legitimate businesses than people who weren't drug dealers.
Now you might say that this should be expected—people with criminal backgrounds might have fewer chances to be hired by someone else, so they have no choice but to work for themselves. But Fairlie crunched the numbers and discovered that structural factors like education and incarceration can't explain the difference. This led him to an explanation that might make some people uncomfortable: The same personality traits and skills that draw people to becoming "businessmen" in the drug trade also lead them to be regular small-business people.
Interestingly, Shane blogged on this subject at the same time that U . S . News published a debate on whether it is time to end the "war on drugs."
Shane says:
Increasing the number of productive entrepreneurs may depend a lot on creating better incentives for those with entrepreneurial preferences and talent to become productive entrepreneurs instead of turning to a life of crime.
This makes me wonder how many gang leaders, drug dealers, and mafia kingpins in prison could have been entrepreneurs doing the next new, new thing if they had been exposed to the right incentives.
So I'll go ahead and ask what Shane seems to be hinting at: Does drug prohibition change the incentives such that potential entrepreneurs pursue lives of crime rather than legitimate businesses?
On one hand, those who call for the legalization or decriminalization of drugs have long argued that the drug war directly fuels the crime around the drug trade that it seeks to fight by creating a massive black market. The high profits in this black market attract people who might otherwise become legitimate entrepreneurs to deal drugs. Fairlie's study shows that there's some empirical support to this argument—these drug dealers wouldn't just all be unemployed vagrants or petty criminals if not for the drug trade. They really do possess a lot of the same qualities that the family that runs your local mom and pop store possesses.
On the other hand, supporters of the drug war can use this research as evidence that legalization or decriminalization of drugs would not do very much good. They might say that it proves that the lack of good jobs in poor areas is a bigger cause of crime than drug prohibition, and so we need policies that directly expand economic opportunity.
So what's the more entrepreneur-friendly policy—ending drug prohibition or continuing it?
Tags: drugs | small business | entrepreneurship
Tools: 
Share
|
| Comments (11) | Print
Reader Comments
drug prohibition is an obstacle to economic development
To make such a claim, drug war advocates would have to ignore the sheer level of profitability that is available in the drug trade. Someone is going to supply the drugs, for that kind of money. If higher-level people have to pay lower-level people more in order to compete with growing local opportunities, they have the money available to be able to do so.
Also, one of the major obstacles to creating more economic opportunity in the inner cities is the violence and the disorder that the illegal drug trade brings. I certainly respect the efforts that are being made to help people economically, and those efforts are important in their own right. But they are struggling against a powerful wind so long as prohibition continues.
The bottom line is that there is an enormous amount of money in the drug trade, and someone is going to fill the jobs that that creates. We will be better off when that money goes into legal, legitimate jobs instead. It is indeed good news that many of the people currently employed by the drug trade may have the skills needed to transition into the licit economy.
David Borden, Executive Director
StoptheDrugWar.org
Washington, DC
http://stopthedrugwar.org
Prohibition triggers violence and corruption! Promote peace and prosperity!
Prohibition triggers violence in our streets and along our borders. It fuels corruption of public officials and injustice in our courts. It incites terrorists by forcing senseless policy on other countries. The black market supports despicable people who sell to children and who recruit them to sell
to their peers. The statistics reveal that racism is epidemic in the drug war.
Celebrating our similarities, free trade or the free market plus building bridges of tolerance to differences in religion, race and lifestyle will create a world of abundance and peace.
Follow the money, if you are in business our drug policies are hurting you. The return on your investment is reduced, your expenses and taxes are higher, plus you face competitors financed by criminals enriched by our drug policies.
www.business-council.org
Organized crime
Organized crime is a necessary evil. When you are organized you have organizations rather than every street punk for him/her self. Crime is going to happen anyway but you dont want every one doing there own thing. You need bosses, rules, and structure; organiztion. When the US became tough on crime and started dismantling organized street crime, the streets where left unsupervised, creating a vaccum. That drug money was supposed to rebuild the same neighborhoods it came from but now the cops are busting everyone and taking the money for themselves.
Add your thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.advertisement
