Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Opinion

Peter Roff

Obama Proving a Drag in Virginia, New Jersey, and New York

October 30, 2009 05:15 PM ET | Peter Roff | Permanent Link | Print

By Peter Roff, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Anyone who follows U.S. politics now accepts as fact the idea that the Republican victories in the off-year elections of 1993 set up the 1994 GOP landslide. According to almost all the analysis, the first real signs that Bill Clinton was much weaker politically than the national media was reporting were the elections of Republican governors in Virginia and New Jersey and Republican mayors in Los Angeles and New York City, hardly hospitable territory for candidates of the Grand Old Party.

Jumping forward 16 years, with a similar set of elections having rolled around, both parties are trying to set up the spin on next week's results. The Republicans will argue that any positive results, like winning the Virginia governorship, mean the GOP is on the comeback trail, with how far along they are being dependent on how many victories they post. The Democrats will argue that the re-election of New Jersey Gov. Jon Corzine, if it happens, or any other good news, means the party remains strong.

In reality, the political landscape today is quite different from what it was in 1993, particularly at the very top. Bill Clinton, who was first elected with less than 50 percent of the popular vote, was the beneficiary of a split conservative coalition, some of which backed George H.W. Bush and some of which backed H. Ross Perot. Further, the pre-election polling just before the ballots were cast showed Bush gaining until former special prosecutor Lawrence Walsh announced an "October surprise" indictment of several Reagan-era cabinet members in connection with his Iran-Contra investigation.

It can and has been argued that Bill Clinton was an accidental president, whose popularity was puffed up by an adoring national media glad to have survived the Reagan-Bush years. This is not the case for Barack Obama, the first Democrat to win the White House with a clear mandate since Lyndon Johnson did it in 1964. And that makes next week's election a real test of Obama's political machine. 

As the first Democrat since Johnson to carry the Old Dominion, Obama's continuing coattails and political organization should have been well positioned to compete for Virginia's three statewide offices. In reality, the three Democratic candidates—Creigh Deeds for governor, Jody Wagner for lieutenant governor, and Steve Shannon for attorney general—have all run behind their GOP opponents throughout most of the general election campaign. And no responsible analysis suggests the Democrats will win control of the House of Delegates, where they are behind by just a few seats.

The one potential bright spot for Democrats next Tuesday is New Jersey, where embattled Gov. Jon Corzine might be able to squeak through, thanks to the presence on the ballot of a third party independent with Republican ties who is currently splitting the anti-Corzine vote.

Obama is taking a stand for Corzine, having made several last-minute trips to the Garden State to campaign for him. But in a state that has been as inhospitable to the Republicans as New Jersey has been over the last few years, the idea that the race is even close again reflects badly on the president. Were he and his agenda as popular as party political operatives would have us believe, the endgame would be unfolding in Virginia while the Democrats were cruising to an easy win in New Jersey.

Nor do the Democrats look competitive in New York City, where Republican-independent Michael Bloomberg is seeking his third four-year term as mayor. While somewhat removed from "a national Republican," Bloomberg accepted the GOP nomination and is running against a real Democrat, New York City Comptroller William Thompson. And if ever there were a place other than Chicago where Obama's push-button political machine could have an impact, could change the dynamic of a race, it should be New York City. So far, the race doesn't even look close.

As a popular president with a national mandate, Obama should be able to demonstrate a positive effect on these campaigns. So far he's been nothing but a drag.

Tags: New Jersey | New York | Virginia | Democrats | Barack Obama

Tools: Share | | Comments (15) | Print

Reader Comments

Move away from the stylus please...

Thanks to the little snit moderates threw in the voting cubical last November we have a real life "Putney Swope"(R.Downey Sr.'s film ) with "Truth & Soul ,Inc."in charge of both Houses.I propose that we take a page from the Anti-2nd Amendment lobby and push a bill through Congress that requires a Three Day Cooling Off Period before voting.

The problem with the GOP

The real and recurring problem with the GOP is that they are not very smart. Before the natives start throwing spears let me explain.

Ronald Reagan was the last good Republican presidential candidate.

Look at who the GOP digs up over the years.

Bush Sr. - elitist, dud as a campaigner and disconnected from mainstream USA

Bob Dole - nice guy, super veteran, to sell things to old folks but geez, Mr. Compromise, he couldn't get cheese added to his burger without giving up something beforehand.

Bush Jr. - if Jr was anymore to the left he would be standing in Hawaii but the worst part of Jr. is he just makes bad decisions over and over again and somehow manages to piss both sides off

McCain - a national hero, rub trading on being a hero gets stale and after 45 years really begins to stink. I can barely remember anything in the campaign where McCain said anything different from Obama

The GOP has a great knack for running off quality talent over stupid stuff like abortion. Jack Kemp would have been a great candidate and president. GOP assassinated his run. JC Watts could have been the first black president but the GOP is full of a bunch of old, rich white guys and they are too self serving to see the country really was looking for a black president for the last ten years or so. I promise you America is not looking for a fiscal conservative, female to give that a try and that is what scares the holy squeeze out of Democrats.

PALIN 2012

I don't personally think she has the chops but she has more experience than the current bozo in charge. But then again the GOP will probably find a way to stab her in the back if it looks like she could really win. Why? well cuz that is what the GOP does.

Can you elaborate?

Mr. Roff,

Your meaning in this entry is clear, but can you back up the assertion, "Obama proving a drag..." with data? I'm not saying you are wrong but that your argument is poorly supported and, as a result, not terribly convincing.

Correlation does not equal causation. Obama-backed candidates may win and they may lose, but either way there will be many factors--national and local--contributing to the outcomes of these elections.

Barring real data linking the current administration's support for democratic candidates and their subsequent electoral losses, I find the thesis of this article a bit hard to swallow.

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. A former senior political writer for United Press International, he is currently a senior fellow at the Institute for Liberty and at Let Freedom Ring, a non-partisan public policy organization. His writing has also appeared on Fox News' Fox Forum.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

People who read this also read ...

Thomas Jefferson St.

Ideological Labels Just Don't Fit

Hard-liners don't understand that some of us don't toe an ideological line.

A Decade in Biased Review

How well does the video sum up the last decade?

GOPers Push European-Style Litmus Tests

Some RNC members want strict party platforms. Why do they hate America?

Can Conservative Carly Fiorina Carry Cali?

Ronald Reagan's state is now one of the most liberal in the nation.

Opinions Clash on Wars in Iran, Afghanistan

Fewer favor the effort in Afghanistan, support rises for hostilities against Iran's nuclear program.

Bennet's Senate Seat Is Already at Risk

His vote on healthcare would be less a case of political martyrdom than it may seem.

Bush Airport Reflects Its Namesake

Could Houston's Bush Intercontinental airport be number one because of its name?

Colorado May Tax Medical Marijuana

Remember the old saying about how if pot could be taxed, it would become legal?

Cartoon Gallery

Editorial Cartoon

Political Cartoons

Check out our most recent cartoons.

Public Opinion

Should the GOP Have a Litmus Test?

Should the RNC exclude politicians who don't match the party's platform?

advertisement

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.