Obamacare Would Let Government Bureaucrats Snoop Through Tax Returns
By Peter Roff, Thomas Jefferson Street blog
One of the rallying cries issuing forth during the congressional recess from those opposed to Obamacare was that members of Congress need to read the health care bill before voting on it. Let Freedom Ring!, an organization with which I am affiliated, even went so far to ask every member of the U.S. House and Senate to pledge they would do so in writing.
The request is simple enough. In fact, it should be a no-brainer. True, the bill under consideration in the House before the August break ran more than 1,000 pages, meaning it would be a lot of work just to read through it. But, when dealing with something as fundamental as health care, which represents close to 20 percent of U.S. GDP, it only makes sense that members of Congress should know what is in it before they vote on it.
The people have good reason to be concerned. The House bill is full of things which may surprise them that have nothing to do with public option or rationing but are equally odious. As Declan McCullagh, who writes the "Taking Liberties" blog for CBS News reported on August 26, the Democratic health care bill divulges IRS tax data to other parts of the government.
McCullagh identified several sections in the House bill that would allow the government access to sensitive IRS data. According to Section 431(a), a provision related to determining eligibility for so-called "affordability credits" the IRS, he wrote, "must divulge taxpayer identity information, including the filing status, the modified adjusted gross income, the number of dependents, and 'other information as is prescribed by' regulation."
Another portion of the bill, Section 1801(a) says, again according to McCullagh's analysis, "that the Social Security Administration can obtain tax return data on anyone who may be eligible for a 'low-income prescription drug subsidy' but has not applied for it."
In a program of the size contemplated in the health care bill, the Congress is right to build in safeguards that would prevent fraud. How far they go in that regard, however, is something that should be open to public debate. People, both in and out of the public spotlight, are notoriously private about what they tell the IRS. Allowing government bureaucrats to snoop through tax returns is just the kind of thing that is liable to raise the public's hackles, especially if it gets through without people knowing it was there.
The idea that certain politicians in Washington are eager to pass a health care bill that contains provisions like this, without giving the people a chance to read it and debate it, should give everyone pause. President Obama has more than three years left in office; the sitting Congress has 14 months before it has to stand for re-election. What's the rush? Isn't it more important to get it right than to get it done?
- Check out our political cartoons.
- Become a political insider: Subscribe to U.S. News Weekly, our digital magazine.
- Follow the Thomas Jefferson Street blog on Twitter.
Tags: healthcare | tax returns | Barack Obama
Tools:
Share
|
| Comments (9) | Print
Reader Comments
Cookies
Not all cookies are bad. you might want to check your security settings and put on medium, sounds like you have it on very high. as long as you got antivirus and something that scans for adware/spyware/malware/whatever else.
now back to being a jerk.
I ain't reading a bill, much less one that's 1000 pages.
I like watching politricks only and I don't care if they pass anything or not. As long as I am still able to do what I want to do I am fine. 8 years of Clinton and Bush I didn't notice anything change in my lifestyle so I don't care. Recession, no change for me so don't care. Iraq, stupid but what do I care.
Winning hearts and minds with bombs and bullets is the dumbest idea I have ever heard but whatever. September 11th, 3000 people I didn't know. Islamists been trying to blow us up for decades, no suprise there.
off topic
Yes I got off track again with the cookies but I get tired of seeing the messages on my computer rejecting them.
I just thought if your bill was 1005 or 1019 one of us will have the wrong bill
I have not had a lot of experience reading bills and they are a little confusing. I have read the constitution of the united states the bill of rights and the declaration of independence. The links below are not the copies that I have in a book but I believe they say the same thing.
I sent senator kyl (http://kyl.senate.gov/) A email and got back a form letter and no follow up email. This is why grass roots groups all around America is important because one person can have a voice but many working together can get things done.
You never know where President OBama will show up, And if he does not, As long as he gets our message that is all I care about
I do think peter roff does other things then just blogging and he does get out the truth as he sees it. maybe he is a politician?
http://www.earlyamerica.com/earlyamerica/freedom/constitution/
http://www.earlyamerica.com/earlyamerica/freedom/bill/
http://www.lawlibraryonline.com/
united.states/declaration.of.independence.htm
Don D. Brock
Dude
Don't suck all the fun out.
I shouldn't have been nice to you.
So...i have no idea if you got the right bill or not based on the number of pages you have. When have you even ever read a bill anyway? Are the town halls really going to influence anything? You have lobbyists making tons of money for some insurance companies working 24/7, what's a one day town hall meeting going to do no matter where its located?
President visiting this blog? Really?
And where exactly do the cookies come into play in the conversation, I'm confused?
This is blog not an article. Which means your reporter isn't a reporter.
advertisement




