Saturday, November 21, 2009

Opinion

Peter Roff

VAT's Next? Obama's Expensive Agenda Means Tax Increases All Around

July 01, 2009 11:43 AM ET | Peter Roff | Permanent Link | Print

By Peter Roff, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

The Democrats are not even pretending to be against tax increases anymore.

Writing in Tuesday's Wall Street Journal, former Clinton Deputy Treasury Secretary Roger Altman explains that, to pay for what Obama wants to do to healthcare in America, "we'll have to raise taxes."

Never mind the rhetoric. Never mind the reluctance. The reality is that Obama's agenda for America is so expensive that tax increases are on the table for everyone who pays taxes. And what Altman suggests is in the offing is particularly pernicious.

Altman says the economic realities created by Obama's already record deficits means that Congress, "possibly next year," will consider ways to impose a European-style Value Added Tax on a heretofore unsuspecting public. "This challenge may be the toughest one Mr. Obama faces in his first term," Altman writes. "Fortunately, the new president is enormously gifted. That's important, because it is no longer a matter of whether tax revenues must increase, but how."

At least Altman is being honest. But he underestimates the challenge. The VAT, which is French for "money machine," is quite popular in Europe because even slight adjustments in the rate produce huge revenues for the government. But to consumers this looks like price inflation rather than government action, so the political consequences are low. Of course most every government that instituted one has been thrown out of office as soon as the voters can do so, leaving behind the VAT as a lasting memorial to its time in office.

The Obama administration appears to be engaged in a sort of reverse Reaganism, at least as they interpreted Reaganism to be, with a helpful assist from former OMB Director David Stockman, who once intimated in an interview that it was his goal to force reductions in federal spending by driving up the deficit. What Obama appears to be doing is to force increases in taxes as far as the eye can see by running up a huge tab with new social spending like the cap and trade bill and nationalized healthcare—new entitlements that can only be funded by taxing all the economic activity in the United States for decades to come.

Tags: taxes

Tools: Share | | Comments (19) | Print

Reader Comments

vat sucks

You want things to be more and more expensive,

FINE DONT DO NOTHING. but not only will you kill the economy and its resources, it will kill HUMAN RESOURCES AS WELL. because people will start leaving the country, i will i cant stand the stupid californian taxes, and imagine if i get a 10 percent in top of that.

HELL NO! im outta here, i go to mexico or whatever.

VAT TAX

Americans are fooling themselves if they don't believe that a VAT TAX has been Obama's plan all along. Why else would anyone, spend, spend and spend more money than they have. If he can create yet another crisis, he will go to Americans and say "we need this VAT TAX to save our economy" Than he will promise that the middle and lower class will get credits so they really won't be paying the VAT TAX. In reality, it may start out that way but as we all know once it's in place, they can always ammend it. Just like our income taxes, they can raise it anytime they want. Watch, they will reduce those credits given to the poor as they go along, and just like Europe, they will incrimentally raise the VAT TAX percentage due yearly. This will crush our economy. As a democrat, this guy is nuts and not the hope and change we voted for.

VAT is insane

The US economy is 70% based on consumer spending. A VAT on top of our current tax system will crush economic growth. The Democrats truly are economically illiterate or completely insane.

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. A former senior political writer for United Press International, he is currently a senior fellow at the Institute for Liberty and at Let Freedom Ring, a non-partisan public policy organization. His writing has also appeared on Fox News' Fox Forum.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

People who read this also read ...

Thomas Jefferson St.

Healthcare Deals Hurt Middle Class

Lawmakers' votes should not be based on the government equivalent of a bribe.

It's Not About Race, Jesse

With a changing African-American electorate, Jesse Jackson's comments can be overlooked.

GOP Aims at Moderate Dems

Votes in favor of healthcare might hurt more moderate Democrats.

Sarah Palin's a Quitter and a Whiner

A 20-city book tour and an appearance on Oprah hardly qualify as public service.

The President and the Rogue

They're about as far apart as the states that produced them.

Jobs Take Back Seat to Healthcare

Try as she might, Pelosi can't change the subject that fast.

Women Still Need Mammograms

Is this the start of rationing healthcare coverage?

The Scope of the House Healthcare Abortion Ba

Stupak-Pitts Amendment would be far-reaching.

Cartoon Gallery

Editorial Cartoon

Political Cartoons

Check out our most recent cartoons.

Public Opinion

Should the FCC Regulate Web Fair Play?

The government may step in to prevent traffic-speed shenanigans.

advertisement

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.