Berkeley Tree-Sitting Saga Continues
An Alameda County Superior Court judge ruled Tuesday to lift an injunction that's been preventing construction of an athletic center at UC-Berkeley, the Daily Californian reports. That means that the days could be numbered for the 44 trees on the construction site that have been at the heart of the dispute between the university and eco-activists. It's the latest development in a saga that already has lasted 19 months and generated 40,000 pages of legal documentation. The organizations that have sued to stop construction on the center can appeal the decision, though—without another injunction—the university could begin work while that appeal is being considered.
The development is bound to fluster further the protesters who have been living in those trees to block construction and their supporters. On Monday, five people involved in the tree-sitting protest at UC-Berkeley were arrested after allegedly attempting to plant an acorn sapling on the chancellor's lawn, the Californian reports.
"We went down...and planted a tree on his lawn, basically giving him a gift of kindness and an offering from the grove," said the de facto leader of the protest. "If I was a public servant...I would welcome that and say thank you for giving us a new life, especially during global warming."
The five were charged with trespassing, attempt to injure, vandalism, and conspiracy, according to the Californian. One also was charged with resisting arrest, and another was charged with battery for allegedly hitting a police officer in the head with a wooden pole, the paper says.
Tags: environment | University of California | UC-Berkeley
Tools:
Share
|
| Comments (2) | Print
Reader Comments
A Mockery of the Free Speech Movement
These protesters are soiling the legacy of Berkeley's free speech and protest movement. At a time when the U.S. is at war these unemployed, hippie-esque marijuana fiends have decided to protest the cutting down of Oak trees. They make up the facts as they go along, claiming the trees are "old growth" when in fact they were part of a University landscaping project in the 1920's. They've attacked the police, and have thrown excrement on them. None are students, yet they label themselves "student protestors." My guess is that none have held real jobs. If they refuse to come down I suggest chopping the trees down anyway.
Free Speech
I can't agree that they are mocking free speech. Free speech is just that. Also, I guess Mr. Michael must know them to call them marijuana fiends. Otherwise, you are engaging in a mockery of free speech called libel I believe. Getting arrested with a small amount of marijuana does not a fiend make... However, it is true that UCB planted the grove and the claims by Native Americans should be investigated (did the tribe protest/make a claim in the 1920s?).
Finally Mr. Michael's last comment is more violent than the throwing of excrement (which is gross but not deadly). But he has the freedom of speech to make libelous and violent remarks. So who's mocking free speech now?
Add your thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.advertisement







