Employers Plan to Expand Wellness Programs Despite Unpopularity
According to a new study, employees don't like wellness programs very much, and employers don't think they're very effective at mitigating healthcare costs or improving employee performance. Yet nearly half of the 561 companies that responded to the PricewaterhouseCoopers survey said they plan to expand their wellness programs over the next two years. What's up with that?
After years of asking employees to pick up more of the tab for their health insurance, many employers believe they're reaching the limit on how much they can shift costs, says Michael Thompson, a principal in the firm's New York health and welfare practice. But costs continue to rise. Premiums rose 6.1 percent in 2007, less than the double-digit growth earlier in the decade but still far outstripping the 3.7 percent increase in worker earnings, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. Something's got to give, and employers hope healthier employees will cost them less. "There's a strong belief that we need to get at the underlying issues and decrease the demand for healthcare, and a major way to do that is to change lifestyle," says Thompson.
In theory, wellness programs that help people quit smoking, lose weight, manage their chronic medical conditions, and the like should help accomplish this goal. Sixty-nine percent of companies surveyed said they offered some sort of program. But for wellness programs to work, getting and staying healthy has to be part of the culture of the company, says Thompson. In other words, it's not enough that a company offer a discounted Weight Watchers program; it needs to make sure there are healthy choices in the snack machines, too. Many companies these days are asking employees to take a health risk questionnaire that identifies potential health problems. But too often there's no subsequent follow-up to address the issues revealed on the form. No wonder people aren't seeing results, either in employee health or healthcare costs.
Employees, who may not be thrilled about their employer playing Big Brother with their health, can take some coaxing to get on board. Less than 30 percent of eligible employees participated in wellness programs overall, according to the survey. But participation improved substantially when employers offered financial incentives—like reduced healthcare premiums, discounts on weight management or smoking cessation programs, or cold, hard cash. For example, without any incentive, 1 in 5 employees filled out a health-risk questionnaire, the study found. When an incentive was offered, the proportion jumped to 48 percent.
Although most employers still try to entice employees with proverbial carrots, a small but growing number are beginning to use sticks to get employees to participate in wellness programs, a trend I examined last fall. Some companies are charging employees more if they smoke or don't meet weight, blood pressure, or cholesterol targets, among other things. The jury is still out on what type of incentives works best.
What would motivate you to participate in a wellness program?
Tags: employees | healthcare | health insurance | employers
Tools:
Share
|
| Comments (7) | Print
Reader Comments
overstepping boundaries
Mainly this is aimed at smokers.I wonder if employees paid for their own medical insurance would these wellness programs go away.. Why not just take some genetic testing on the job. How far away are we from that.
www.smokersclubinc.com
www.forces.org
I Already Have a Mother
Nothing would motivate me to participate in any wellness program except my own desire. Fortunately the firm I work for actually believes that it's ADULT employees are quite capable of caring for themselves and asking their own doctors for advice IF and WHEN they need/want it. At least for now they do.
I've never been a follower, and this is just another fad/trend I will NOT follow. I will NOT submit myself to someone else's ideology or choices. I make my own choices for myself, and seek advice when I need it.
As the only smoker in my office, I can also tell you that I'm the only one who has not called in sick in the past 2 years. This year alone (barely 7 months into it), all my non-smoking, non-drinking, healthy eating co-workers have called in sick.....a couple of them several times. They've all taken their turns leaving early due to "not feeling well".
Sorry, I'll stick to smoking if they are what being "healthy" is all about.
Dissenting opinion
These programs are not just aimed at smokers. Anyone making lifestyle health choices that increase the risk of sickness (including tobacco use, poor diet, sedentary lifestyle) increases the costs to the program far more than those who do not embrace these habits.
You can choose to participate or not. You may just pay more to do so. Just like you would if you were a driver who speeds, commits several DUI-s with several accidents on their record. If you are a bad driver, you should pay more. This is consistent with how insurance works. It is just it has never applied to our health coverage, but it should.
Like my 93 yr-old grandfather who smoked, there are going to be happy exceptions like "have a mother smoker" and myy grandfather. But it cannot be argued with integrity that these lifestyle choices do not impact the costs for the rest of us.
By the way, I am not a granola-eating triathlete, but just an average guy who would pass some of the tests and not others. If my company would have this program, I would not get all of the incentives, but it would be my choice.
Add your thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.advertisement






