Dying Too Young for Lack of Coverage
If we want to measure how well our healthcare system is working, tracking premature death is arguably the ultimate yardstick. Now a new study spells out, state by state, how many people died in 2006 because they didn't have health insurance. In California, for instance, more than eight working-age people died each day because they lacked coverage, a total of 3,100 for the year. The death toll from lack of insurance was 390 in Arkansas. And so on.
The concept isn't new, but seeing the numbers spelled out for your own state literally brings it home. In 2002, the Institute of Medicine found that adults without insurance were 25 percent more likely to die before their time than those with private insurance. It estimated that 18,000 adults died in 2000 for this reason. The Urban Institute later updated that figure to 22,000 for 2006. Families USA, a nonprofit health advocacy group, has now broken down the figures for 25- to 64-year-olds in every state and the District of Columbia. The group's report, "Dying for Coverage," was released today.
"Health insurance really matters in how people make their healthcare decisions," says Ron Pollack, Families USA's executive director. "We know that people without insurance often forgo checkups, screenings, and other preventive care."
The connection between health insurance and premature death has been attracting plenty of research interest lately. Recently, I wrote about the United States's worst-in-the-industrialized-world rank for preventing premature deaths, and I also reported on our less-than-impressive tally of states that require insurance coverage of colonoscopy tests to screen for colon cancer. Now here we are again. Nobody likes being reminded of life's certainties—at tax time, no less—but death is one event we ought to be able to, if not avoid, at least not hasten because of inadequate health coverage.
Tags: healthcare | health insurance | death rates
Tools:
Share
|
| Comments (3)
Reader Comments
What a conclusive leap!
Maybe the one's who don't have health insurance have a tendency to engage in unhealthy lifestyles!
The fact that they do not have health insurance is hardly definitive in determining their cause of bad health outcomes.
Your comment is uninformed and sad
The article is about the fact that thousands of people are dying each year in the wealthiest nation in the world, because they do not have adequate health coverage. This is shameful and unnecessary. If we want to call ourselves humane and just we all have to take the responsibility of providing basic care to our neighbors and fellow citizens.
What a conclusive....pre-judement
Before presumming or pre-judging that people may have unhealthy lifestyles, why not first, click on the links and read more of the article, which contains more of the details? Yes it is a summary of the overall study, but there is some details that might explain some of the findings.
For example:
Uninsured adults are more likely to be diagnosed with a disease in an advanced stage. For example, uninsured women are substantially more likely to be diagnosed with advanced stage breast cancer than women with private insurance.
MO
So, imagine if you were unemployed, or between jobs and faced with the choice of paying for rent, or going to the doctor without insurance for annual tests. Then add in, a single mom, divorced with 2 kids and a dad that refuses to pay his child support. Yeah, that is an unhealthy lifestyle - but not one that most would choose.
Add your thoughts
All comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.advertisement



