Marriage, in Sickness and for Health Insurance
After 12 years of unwedded bliss, two friends of mine recently got married. The reason: Her job offers health insurance benefits to married couples but not unhitched cohabiting ones. Now it turns out these two may have been at the leading edge of a trend. According to a new poll, 7 percent of respondents said they or someone they lived with decided to get married in the last year in order either to have access to health insurance benefits or to give their new spouse access.
And they say romance is dead. At a time when the typical family health plan costs upwards of $12,000 a year, sharing a group policy number is more than a token way to say "I love you." It's a hefty commitment, giving new meaning to "in sickness and in health."
The Kaiser Family Foundation poll reported other ways in which healthcare is emerging as an influential economic factor in many people's lives. Twenty-eight percent of middle-income families earning between $30,000 and $75,000 reported having a serious problem paying for healthcare because of recent changes in the economy. Nearly a quarter said that within the past year they or someone they lived with had either taken a new job or stayed with their current one because of better health benefits.
Healthcare concerns ranked near the top of people's economic woes. Twenty-eight percent of respondents said paying for healthcare or health insurance was a "serious problem." That's more than the proportion reporting serious problems paying their mortgage (19 percent) or credit card or other personal debt (18 percent) or affording food (18 percent). (Paying for gas was the top problem, reported by 44 percent, followed by getting a well-paying job or pay raise, at 29 percent.)
"We tend to treat healthcare and the economy as separate issues," says Drew Altman, president and CEO of the Kaiser Family Foundation. "This poll shows that paying for healthcare really is emerging as one of the public's top economic problems."
Kaiser also asked respondents their views about healthcare and the 2008 presidential election. As it had in earlier rounds, healthcare remains a top concern in the April survey, ranking third—behind the economy and the war in Iraq—among voters of all political affiliations as the issue they'd most like the candidates to address. The telephone survey of 2,003 adults was conducted between April 3 and 13. A few weeks ago, I wrote this thorough examination of the candidates' healthcare reform proposals.
Tags: healthcare | health insurance | marriage
Tools:
Share
|
| Comments (3)
Reader Comments
Not really a new trend
Over 20 years ago I married a man I had been living with for 13 years primarily so that he could get on my health insurance program and receive some much needed surgery. Unfortunately the marriage didn't last but even after our separation we stayed legally married for over 2 more years so that he could continue to have access to the health insurance. It would be nice if we could add anyone to our existing policies as long as we are willing to pay the premiums.
A flip side
Marrying someone to give him or her healthcare on your group plan might be a mightily sweet and selfless thing to do. Only a society RUN BY CORPORATIONS, though, would create the circumstances for such a thing to be considered.
Speaking of "considering" things, consider this. Married couples who have a child with severe and expensive medical conditions are sometimes advised to get a divorce so that the spouse with custody becomes impoverished and can qualify the child for Medicaid. Oops, the party of "family values" just threw both you and the "family" political talk they like so much right out the upper-floor window.
Elect Democrats and keep electing them until your health insurance is yours forever in a not-fo-profit setting that has nothing whatever to do with your marital status or where you work.
Health Benifits
Some seniors who have medical benifits from Champus are staying single, as they can not afford to lose the Champus insurance from a deceased spouse.
Just having Medicare and or a supplement can wipe out even a good nest egg.
I know, becxause I contacted a Staf Infectrion, and even with Champus I have some serious medical bills. Copayments are also a tremendous burder on any low income senior, as I am.
The government needs to start withholding Medicade payments from all workers, just as I had to pay into Medicare, as all do now, Medicade should not be free.
Just $1.00 a week from everyone to go into a Medicade fund for all would not hurt , but it sure would help.
Add your thoughts
All comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.advertisement



