6 Ways Restaurants Could Market Good Health
In New York City, chain restaurants are now officially required to post calorie counts for the items on their menu boards. I wrote before about the reaction to this when it went into effect, and now violators are being cited, albeit with no real penalties until the summer.
It will be interesting to see if the news that Jamba Juice's 16-ounce Mango Peach Topper smoothie with granola contains 500 calories affects the number of people ordering it for breakfast. In the meantime, nutrition experts (and the restaurant industry, which is still fighting the NYC regulations) have other ideas about how restaurants could encourage diners to make more healthful food choices. Here are a few of them:
1. Add more low-calorie items. If there are just one or two low-cal items and everything else on the menu is far higher in calories, people won't go for the lighter options, says Collin Payne, acting director of the Cornell University Food and Brand Lab, which researches how unconscious cues affect our eating habits. A token offering of applesauce as a side dish in a sea of french fries and onion rings is going to look "starkly different," he says, so different that people are likely to say, "That's odd," and ignore it.
2. Make it easier to order smaller portions. Fast-food chains offer various sizes, but it's a lot harder to watch portion sizes at casual dining restaurants like Outback Steakhouse or Red Lobster. Marion Nestle, a nutrition professor at New York University, suggests a price-break strategy; even 30 percent less money for a half portion might induce some people to downsize. T.G.I. Friday's is currently advertising its expanded "Right Portion, Right Price" menu to emphasize the low prices on its smaller entrees and desserts, not a bad strategy in current economic environment.
3. Make nutritious kids' meals the default option. If you ordered a Happy Meal, you'd automatically get apple slices and low-fat milk to accompany the burger. If parents wanted to order the fries and Sprite instead, they'd have to ask, says Nestle.
4. Emphasize lower-calorie beverages. Recommendations from a 2006 report by the nonprofit Keystone Center on away-from-home foods and preventing weight gain include the suggestion that food service outlets offer more low- or zero-calorie drinks, like seltzer and unsweetened iced tea, on their menus. Smaller drink portions would help, too.
5. Pay as much attention to the marketing of more healthful options as to the standard fare. Research at Cornell suggests that words matter: Using descriptive labels like "Black Forest chocolate cake" instead of "chocolate cake" makes diners buy more and rate the food more favorably. So chains could use that to the advantage of more wholesome options. That's what McDonald's is most likely doing with its Fruit 'n Yogurt Parfait, though the Reduced Fat Ice Cream Cone could use a little wordsmithing to make it sound as tempting as the Chocolate Triple Thick Shake.
6. Use HealthyDiningFinder.com to seek out menu options before you leave the house. Guess who suggested this? The restaurant industry would prefer that chain outlets aren't compelled to post the calorie count right there on the menu board, saying it violates the First Amendment. That info is available elsewhere, they say, including on the HealthyDining website. True, but the site isn't comprehensive, and the info can be hard to find on the individual companies' sites; here's one review of restaurant nutritional websites by the New York Times.
If you want to track the NYC legal battle and the broader issue of calorie labels, Nestle's blog What to Eat is following it. And readers, would any of these propositions get you to pick the yogurt parfait over the shake the next time you're dining out?
Tags: New York City | food | restaurants | health | diet and nutrition
Tools:
Share
|
| Comments (3)
Reader Comments
Food NAZI alert!
So, Putting the calorie counts was just the beginning! Now, you want to dictate the the menu. What's next? outlaw 'big' portions. Or how about having a scale at the door, and if your height/weight calculation isn't 'good enough', you aren't allowed to eat. I wish people like you would stop trying to force your agenda and diet down people's throats.
Katherine Hobson: These options (proposed by nutritionists and researchers, not me) are in the direction of more, not fewer, options (additional smaller portion sizes for less money, more appealing low-cal options in addition to the regular stuff, more low- or no-cal beverages). The only exception is the kids' meal suggestion, and I don't know any pediatrician who wouldn't agree that encouraging kids to swap out soda and fries for something more nutritious, or at least making it the default option, is a good idea. No one's talking about a weigh-in at the door; people are talking about letting those who eat at chain restaurants (pretty much everyone) have more choices in what they eat and buy there. I can't think why that's a bad thing.
Daily calorie counts
John, You must be an active young man to have a daily calorie count of 2500 calories. For a not-terribly active woman older than 60, the recommended daily calorie allowance (to avoid gaining weight) is about 1600 calories. For me, that translates to about 350 for breakfast, 500 lunch, 500 dinner, and 250 for extras and snacks. 500 calories for a breakfast drink is a bit much for me.
Bob, if you want to eat crappy food, far be it for me to try to stop you. Go right ahead. But please don't obstruct efforts that make it possible for people like me, who do want to try to keep a healthy weight, blood sugar, cholesterol and blood pressure level, to be able to eat in restaurants without risking our health. I am not a "food Nazi" - I just want stay active and healthy and live to a ripe old age.
Add your thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our comment guidelines.advertisement



Jamba's menu
500 calories for breakfast is not in itself a bad thing, if they're nutritious and healthy calories, and you don't eat more than 2500 a day (or so), and you get some exercise. On the other hand, their old menu had a 1000 calorie item that probably couldn't be justified except for a triathlete.
May 08, 2008 20:21:51 PM [permalink] [report comment]