College Health Plans Don't Always Cover Student Athletes
Many injured college athletes are being saddled with thousands of dollars in unexpected medical bills because the details of NCAA regulations requiring universities to insure their athletes are unclear, the New York Times reports.
Four years ago, the NCAA began enforcing a regulation that all collegiate student athletes needed insurance before they began competing. Some institutions meet these requirements by covering nearly 100 percent of an injured student athlete's medical expenses, but other schools claim almost no responsibility to pay such bills if a student has private insurance, according a review by the Times of public documents from a cross section of universities and interviews with current and former athletes, trainers, administrators, and NCAA officials.
"I thought I would be covered," says Erin Knauer, a Colgate University student who piled up $80,000 in medical bills after injuring her back and legs while training for the school's crew team. Because of the way her condition was diagnosed, insurance will cover only about one third of Knauer's bill.
Many student athletes have medical insurance through their parents, but often these plans exclude coverage of injuries sustained during participation in varsity sports and injuries that require out-of-state treatment. Some colleges purchase secondary policies to fill the gaps left by students' family plans, but even these plans have disclaimers that could leave students uncovered in some situations.
Those familiar with the lack of mandated, comprehensive coverage for collegiate athletes are calling for change, but it's unlikely the NCAA will alter its policies anytime soon because the cost of mandating coverage for all athletes would be extremely high. Some of the largest universities with the biggest, winningest, and best-known athletic teams provide comprehensive coverage for their athletes, but students playing sports at many other schools are not as lucky.
Former Ohio University football player Jason Whitehead injured himself so badly during a workout in 2001 that he was temporarily paralyzed and had be airlifted to a nearby hospital, according to the Times article. Whitehead took the bills from his career-ending surgery that were not covered by his father's insurance to the Ohio University trainers, but the school refused to pay. Whitehead, now 28, found out six years after his surgery that he still had a few thousand dollars in unpaid medical bills while reviewing paperwork to buy his first car.
"The coach says, 'You're on full scholarship. If you ever get hurt, we'll make sure to take care of you,' " he says. "There's a lot of us out there that get used."
Tags: colleges | health insurance | education | college athletics
Tools:
Share
|
| Comments (5) | Print
Reader Comments
health care for student athletes
Only take Canadian's. They come with.
College Sports
I played baseball in college. I never had any severe/career ending injuries ... I just wasn't good enough to get to the next level. I did see, first hand, great athlete-students (student-athlete implies that they were academically inclined which was not quite the case) who had major elbow/shoulder/knee/ankle injuries--injuries typicall to baseball players. The school I played for had a lack luster student health program and, like the article stated.
Rarely, if ever, does college baseball draw crowds like football and basketball. But my contention is this: mega NCAA schools are able to financially exploit the ability, gift, skill, and talent of amature athletes, therefore the schools have a fiduciary responsibility to care for those athletes who were injured and not only that, but make them "whole" in every legal sense of the word.
Big name schools like OSU, OU, USC, etc make millions and have made millions on the backs of scholarship athletes just from tickets sales; not to mention concessions, TV royalties, advertisements, endorsements, etc. Time is overdue for colleges and universities to act responsibile--bastion of learning, my big toe, more like bastion of exploitation. And it's time society stops giving these "corporations" a free pass.
Roger (below)
You don't seem to understand that what is too expensive for the government, in your view, is increasingly too expensive for private citizens and businesses in our current "system".
Your "leave-it-alone" scenario simply means more personal bankruptcies, more dropped group plans, more clogged emergency rooms, more Medicaid/Schip welfare, and more people who forego basic care because they're not rich. Baloney! Give me the problems of Canada and the UK any day.
Besides, this article is about financing the care for sports injuries. I have a solution for this growing problem. You don't.
I have another idea, too. Drop the health care subsidy of all employees in the public sector and you'll have single-payer adopted in a fortnight. All but the richest few who work in the private sector already know they're in deep trouble on this. The business owners know it and the employees know it. Why don't you?
advertisement







