Education Reformers Tackle NCLB Flaws
Several urban education leaders testified during a congressional hearing in Washington this week about key reforms that are helping their troubled school systems narrow the achievement gap. The panel included New York City schools Chancellor Joel Klein and D.C. public schools Chancellor Michelle Rhee, two mayor-appointed leaders whose work turning around failing inner-city schools is being closely watched by educators around the country. They were joined by their bosses and the mayors of their respective cities, Michael Bloomberg and Adrian Fenty, as well as the leaders of the Atlanta and Chicago public school systems.
There were few, if any, surprises during the testimony phase. But when the discussion turned to what can be done to improve the No Child Left Behind law, Klein and Arne Duncan, the chief executive officer of Chicago public schools, ripped on one of the unintended consequences of the law: the dumbing down of state curriculum standards. "I know this is hard for you to hear Chairman [George] Miller, but we need national standards and national assessments," Klein said. He pointed out that the country needs an accurate and uniform way to measure how students are doing across states and against students from other developed and emerging economies. For every state to have its own set of standards, Duncan added, "just doesn't make any sense." Miller, who has called for more rigorous standards but resisted federal intervention, didn't respond to Klein's challenge.
Rhee offered another idea to improve NCLB that has also been highly contentious: tying teacher pay to student outcomes. As the head of the only school district in the nation that has fallen into "high-risk" status with the federal government for its dismal performance, Rhee is trying to narrow the achievement gap by getting rid of ineffective teachers and using bonuses to encourage the best ones to work in challenging schools. Ultimately, she wants to evaluate teachers based on test scores and other measures of student performance. Teacher unions have traditionally resisted using test scores to compensate teachers. Again, the response from lawmakers was silence. But they promised to take their advice into consideration when a revised version of NCLB comes for a vote. Klein injected a sense of urgency toward the end of the discussion when he said, "The clock is ticking."
Tags: public schools | teachers | education | No Child Left Behind
Tools:
Share
|
| Comments (9) | Print
Reader Comments
No Child Left Behind is a Handicap to Educating
Besides NCLB being flawed in its concept and requirements, it is a handicap because it is a federal law with no national standard. Not only do states have their own tests, but these tests are not consistently held constant. Therefore, educators and students are chasing a moving target and have no historical comparison to use.
It is fine to say "raise the bar" on education; however, if each state has a different height and a different bar, how can anyone say they are truly performing better?
NCLB should be revoked completely unless a qualified, consistent, national standard is required as part of the law.
Paying teachers based on student performance
I believe one possible consequence of such provisions would be that competent teachers will be more likely than ever before to avoid poverty stricken schools, as well as all other student populations that are perceived to already be performing below standard. One psychological ramification of monetary rewards for some is that they can be interpreted as monetary deprivation for others, especially in such a low paying profession. This would completely undermine the goals of the NCLB Act.
I urge you to contact your congressional representatives about your opinions on changes to NCLB before they vote on it!
Teaching to the test?
Well we have been teaching to the test to get our math and reading scores up. Guess what they went up, but Science tanked. Ha! figure that? The drop out rate is up, schools are teaching to the test, NCLB is working great???? What public schools should be doing is providing a basic education for life. It's all about giveing them some general knowledge then letting them get out into the real world and figure out what they want to do... college, work, research, entertain. NCLB is bad law. Our education system has never really been that bad, those that wanted to excel do. NCLB is what happens when you get a group of people together that has never taught a class before (100% passing rate, yea right, show me anything that is 100%). NCLB is like telling a high school football coach everyone of your players must be NFL ready by 2014 or you will be deemed a failure or telling a doctor none of his patients can passaway this year or he has to go back to school.
advertisement







