High School Grades and SAT: Still Best Predictor of College Success, Study Says
Changes made to the SAT—mainly a writing section added in 2005—"did not substantially change how well the test predicts first-year college performance." That was one of the key findings contained in a study released this week by the College Board, which owns the SAT. The study says high school grades continue to be a slightly more accurate predictor of college success than SAT scores. If there was reason to be disappointed by those findings, College Board officials did not give any hint while announcing them to reporters. Laurence Bunin, who serves as the general manager of the SAT program, said the SAT is still the most reliable test "in an era when grade inflation at the high school level is a major problem." He strongly urges colleges to continue to use both high school grades and SAT scores to evaluate applicants. According to the research, grades and SAT scores—used together—are the best predictor of college success.
The College Board added the writing portion and made other changes to the math and reading sections of the SAT three years ago. At the time, critics complained that the verbal and math SAT was biased against certain groups and not a reliable measure of academic performance. The revamped SAT appeased some critics, like the University of California system, which had threatened to stop requiring the test. Others remained skeptical, choosing not to put too much emphasis on the SAT writing score. It's still too early to say how the new research from the College Board will alter the admissions landscape. Before the findings were officially released, the National Center for Fair and Open Testing, a nonprofit group in Cambridge, Mass., critical of standardized testing, issued a statement saying the changes to the SAT were "not a serious attempt to improve the test" and would not stop colleges from making the test an optional requirement for admission.
College Board officials said they are pleased with the changes they made and have no immediate plans to make any more changes to the SAT as a result of their research.
Tags: students | SAT | College Board
Tools:
Share
|
| Comments (11) | Print
Reader Comments
Principal of Seneca, SC high school admits cahnging grades
Imagine receiving a letter on Seneca, SC high school stationary and the current principal names himself and two administrators of having changed the grades of failing students to passing. The topper of this admission is that the course was academic math and in SC a passing grade in this course is required for graduation. You may think it didn't happen, but it did, regardless that in SC their action is a misdemeanor offense.
Tragedy of Students Grade Inflation
I am a concerned adult, grandparent, great-grandparent and advocate for children more than 33 years;beyond the years of my children's school days. If there was such thing as grade inflation in my school days, it did not appear to be as contaminating as it is today. Teachers were focused on student learning, while parents were actively involved in the education process. However, there were instances when children were identified as "the teacher's pet" the quality of learning was not cheapened by low-expectations and inadequate concerns for the students. If students are expected to perform at the highest level, excuses for less than the best will not be accepted at any time, for any reason. Some students have convinced themselves that (false images) a social life, is more important than life long learning. Both the teacher and parents have a responsibility to their student(s)in achieving .
Example of grade inflation
Allegations of grade inflation prompt audit
Thursday, Jul 17, 2008
By John Lyon
Arkansas News Bureau
LITTLE ROCK - State auditors will look into allegations teachers in a college studies program for high school students were pressured into giving students higher grades than they deserved.
The state Department of Higher Education has asked the Division of Legislative Audit to conduct an audit of the Arkansas Early College High School Program offered by the Southeast Arkansas Education Service Cooperative in Monticello.
Students at 40 high schools across the state participate in the program, which uses distance learning to let students get a head start on their college education by taking college courses while still in high school. Twenty-four colleges and universities in the state are partners in the program.
In a June 12 e-mail to legislative auditor Roger Norman, state Higher Education Director Jim Purcell requested an audit of the program in response to complaints he said the department received in April.
Purcell wrote the state Department of Education and the Department of Higher Education investigated the complaints and found that "credibility issues were corroborated through multiple sources."
Current and former employees of the program told investigators that students in the early college program received higher grades than they deserved; teachers were pressured by management to change students' grades; and teachers were harassed and/or fired for refusing to lower standards or change grades.
In the e-mail, Purcell quoted the comments of several current and former employees to investigators, including:
-"If the grades weren't high enough we were to redo tests, or whatever it took to make sure those grades were high enough."
-"Plenty of pressure to give good grades. If you did not do so, you would not be renewed."
-"The grades I submitted ... were not high enough, so I was required to do grade changes on the students."
-"This is nothing but a scam. I am very disheartened by what I saw ... I was asked to give students grades they did not deserve. ... All they wanted was numbers."
Deputy Higher Education Director Steve Floyd said Wednesday he could not comment on the department's audit request.
Auditors will make an on-site visit to the cooperative next week, legislative auditor Tim Thompson said Wednesday.
Bruce Terry, who was director of the cooperative in April when the complaints were made about the early college program, was suspended with pay by a vote of the cooperative's board on June 20.
Paul Keith, the board's attorney, said Wednesday he could not comment on personnel decisions of the board. Board president Keith Alexander did not return a call seeking comment Wednesday.
Laura Creach, the former coordinator of the Arkansas Early College High School Program, resigned in April and filed a grievance against Terry alleging sexual harassment.
The board hired a consulting firm, HR Factor of Fayetteville, to investigate Creach's allegation. In a report dated June 18, the firm concluded that "the facts do not support a sexual harassment claim."
Creach told the Arkansas News Bureau the investigation was "a joke." She said a hearing on her grievance is scheduled for July 28, and that if she does not prevail she expects to file a lawsuit.
Creach also said she once witnessed Terry directing a teacher to change the grades of students who had been caught cheating. The teacher had given the students grades of zero, she said.
"He (Terry) felt like that if students had low grades, they would be afraid to sign up for classes next year and it would hurt the overall program," Creach said.
Terry's attorney, Charles Sidney Gibson, said Terry denies Creach's allegations of harassment.
"He denies those wholeheartedly," Gibson said. "Didn't happen."
Gibson said he was not aware that Creach had claimed Terry pressured teachers to inflate students' grades. An invitation to Terry to respond was extended through his attorney, but Terry did not immediately respond Wednesday.
Gibson said Terry has 30 days from the date of his suspension to request a hearing, but as of Wednesday he had not done so.
advertisement







