A flap over the firings of several U.S. attorneys is back in the news today after a House Judiciary subcommittee subpoenaed four of the ousted prosecutors yesterday.
Chatter on the subject kicked up again after the former U.S. attorney from New Mexico, David Iglesias, said he believed he may have been fired for political reasons. Speculation quickly zeroed in on New Mexico Republicans Sen. Pete Domenici and Rep. Heather Wilson, McClatchy Newspapers reports, after the rest of the state's fairly small delegation denied any involvement. (The liberal blog TalkingPointsMemo.com has also persistently gone after this story.)
But as we wrote in early February, hard evidence exists that some--though not all--of the ousted attorneys weren't performing up to snuff. The Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) provides data on, among other things, the total number of prosecutions each attorney initiated and the median prison sentence for those convicted, by category. As one can see, some of the fired attorneys appear to have been doing their job very well, while others do not.
Updating those figures for New Mexico, from 2002 to 2006 prosecutions initiated by Iglesias rose 5 percent. Immigration cases were up 25 percent, while drug/narcotics cases were down 15 percent and weapons charges down 10 percent. Meanwhile, the median sentence for weapons charges was up 14 percent, from 21 to 24 months. Total median sentencing dropped from 12 months in 2002 to 10 months in 2006.
The numbers are only part of the story, of course. More prosecutions can merely mean that prosecutors are going after smaller potatoes, though that fact would show up in a dramatic drop in the median sentence.
In this case, however, no one seems to be paying attention to the numbers at all.