Surprise: ETF Fees Are Going Up
Exchange-traded funds are known for their dirt-cheap annual expenses, but data from Morningstar show that they're getting pricier: The average ETF now charges 0.54 percent in annual fees, up from 0.41 percent a year ago.
That may seem like chump change, but as the Wall Street Journal points out, if you put $10,000 into an ETF with a 0.54 percent expense ratio that earns an annualized 8 percent over 20 years, you'll have $41,826—about $1,100 less than if you had invested in a fund with a 0.41 percent expense ratio (which earned the same return over that period).
Not surprisingly, the more exotic, narrowly focused ETFs are leading the uptick in expenses. You can still buy broad-market ETFs on the cheap: For example, the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF charges just 0.07 percent annually, and the SPDR S&P 500 ETF charges 0.10 percent. But specialized funds charge more—sometimes a lot more—such as the HealthShares European Medical Products and Devices ETF, which levies a 0.95 percent expense ratio.
The Journal points out a few helpful sites for comparing the costs of ETFs:
• To sort ETFs by expense ratio, check out Morningstar's ETF screener, or try IndexUniverse's screener.
• For a detailed analysis, check out the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority's Mutual Fund Expense Analyzer (it includes ETFs.)
Compare the cost of investing in ETFs versus no-load mutual funds using Rydex Investments' Trading Expense Calculator.
Tags: investing | exchange traded funds
Tools:
Share
|
| Comments (2) | Print
Reader Comments
A simple question
Aside from management fees, does anyone below have any idea how much money goes from investors (as a group) to market-makers (as a group) on the difference between bid and ask in the daily trading of these things? If so, please share what you know.
I have a feeling most of us don't know the full score on why ETFs are springing up faster than weeds.
Fees are based on strategy
One reason ETF fees are going up is because the providers are creating more products based on actively managed 'strategy indexes' rather than simple ‘market indexes’. For example, ETFs based on indexes that follow a fundamental weighting strategy are on average more than three times more expensive than comparable capitalization weighted ETFs. ETFs that follow a quantitative security selection strategy are eight times more expensive than ETFs that follow 'market indexes.' For more information, see THE ETF BOOK. Also, for a great database on index strategy and cost, see www.ETFguide.com.
Add your thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.advertisement

