Monday, November 9, 2009

Opinion

Morgan E. Felchner

Olympic Moms and Pregnancy in Politics

August 21, 2008 04:45 PM ET | Morgan E. Felchner | Permanent Link | Print

"Ruining their lives," "Selfish and self indulgent," or "overambitious." These are all characterizations given to women who choose to...GASP...have children while in political office.

But the issue isn't limited to public office. Women at law firms, advertising agencies, and professions across the spectrum are sometimes shoved into the closet, if not out the door, when they decide to have a family. If they maintain their position or advance, they then begin a balancing act akin to walking the balance beam to ensure their children are well cared for and they are excelling in their own right. A new profession came onto my radar with all of the Olympics coverage: mother/world-class athlete.

Before I get too far, I have an admission: I am not a mother, let alone a working mother.

Despite many advances for women in politics, it's still a shock when a woman chooses to have a child during her term in office. (Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's pregnancy caused some to remove her from a list of McCain's potential vice presidential candidates.) Jane Swift of Massachusetts was pregnant with twins while she was running for governor (and delivered them while serving as acting governor) and she faced a barrage of criticism echoing the sentiments above. Some may always see pregnancy and politics as going together like oil and water, but at least we've seen some advances. And just like in politics, when a woman takes time out from her sport to give birth, it is equally as shocking.

Sports Illustrated ran an article this week titled "Mother Load," about women athletes on the United States Olympic team who are also mothers. This year, there are 20 mothers out of the 286 women on the team. Being a world-class athlete takes dedication and time, and any woman who can balance raising a child with training deserves a gold medal just for that. But these women don't expect praise for raising their children, nor do they expect kudos when they come back to the sport after giving birth (much harder presumably than returning to the nonphysical world of politics). They want to win gold medals and they do so with the support of their children and spouses.

The same goes for women in politics. With the support of their families, women can have it all. We can run for office or be an Olympian and have a family simultaneously. It is worth pointing out, however, that despite much improvement, articles like the one in Sports Illustrated show that we haven't come far enough. Until it's commonplace for women to have children and still do the stuff of their dreams, whether it's winning Olympic gold or the presidency, it's evident we have some work to do.

But for the time being, congratulations to all of the women, this month in particular the Olympians, who make it work and make it easier for the rest of us to have it all, too.

Tags: politics | working women | Olympics

Tools: Share | | Comments (6) | Print

Reader Comments

Interesting site

Excellent site! I wish the owner to develop and please all! http://kino-multi.ru/map.html

Dreams

For many women, raising children is the "stuff of their dreams." Let's not forget that.

While I'm all for supporting working moms (especially politicians), being able to stay home with my kids is "having it all" to me.

This is just another example of how difficult and unfair it is to label women as successful or not, especially women who also happen to be mothers.

PALIN V BIDEN

Without doubt, Palin as VP will help McCain more than Biden will help Obama. Biden a career politician, and washington insider, has fed at the public trough more than half of his 65 years of life, and can point to no significant accomlishments that has affected america. He's a good reason for term limits if one was inclined to support that position. Obama says he a candidate for change, but picks a tired old man, a washington insider for 35 years, as his number two man. One would think that in these times when people are losing their homes, jobs, and self-esteem Biden, with all of his suppossed experience, would have been the first to develop unique solutions to these problems. Have you heard of any?

Palin is a young progressive leader. Only a few years into her first term as Governor of Alaska, her poll numbers are 80%. Why? Perhaps its her ability to lead. People are weary of the old and tired politicians who vote strictly along party lines such as Biden. After awhile they lose their ability to think outside the box(if they ever did) or think at all. Whatever the party wants is the way Biden votes.

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

Morgan E. Felchner is a managing editor at U.S. News & World Report. She is the editor of Voting in America.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

People who read this also read ...

Thomas Jefferson St.

Voters' Top Priority: The Economy

Obama Democrats should stop rushing healthcare reform and address more important issues.

H1N1 Vaccine for Wall Street?

Another example of what's wrong with government run healthcare.

Healthcare Vote Delays a Bad Sign for Dems

Expect more waiting, and arm twisting, as vulnerable reps take the hint from voters.

Americans Want Jobs, Not Healthcare Reform

As the unemployment rate reaches double digits, the public makes its preference known.

California Candidates' Poor Voting Record

Couldn't Carly Fiorina and Meg Whitman have put a note in their BlackBerrys about voting?

Pelosi Cracks the Whip on Moderates

She's using fear of payback to push middle-of-the-road Democrats to vote for the House bill.

A Dollar a Day to Keep the Babies Away

North Carolina program aiding at-risk kids needs to go nationwide.

The New V Takes Swipes at Both Sides

Are they sniping at Obama? Sure? Bush too.

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.