That Elusive Market Bottom
BlackRock's Bob Doll points out that "high-profile financial failures," such as what's happening with Bear Stearns, often coincide with market bottoms (boldface is mine):
From an equity markets perspective, investors continue to ask whether we are in the midst of a bottoming process or whether the floor of the markets is about to collapse. Unfortunately, there is no hard and fast way to identify a market bottom. Our best guess is that we are nearing bottom rather than beginning a more significant collapse, and that we are not that far from the bottom. Historical precedent shows that a series of explosive daily moves seems to be the norm for a bear phase to end, and that such moves are necessary prerequisites for allowing the markets to regain their footing. Additionally, we would point out that high-profile financial failures (such as that which has just occurred with Bear Stearns) are often coincident with market bottoms. As such, we believe the market will eventually change direction and tone, although we recognize that this will not happen immediately.
Citigroup says that bottom could be in the neighborhood of 1165 for the S&P 500 index, or 8.3 percent lower than the troughs seen so far. But think of the upside: The typical post-bear-market rally has been almost 42.5 percent, on average, says Citi, and "various metrics would support a better than 20 percent recovery from current levels over the next 12 months."
Tags: recession | stock market | Bear Stearns
Tools:
Share
|
| Comments (4)
Reader Comments
jgaroizhc qdjap
vzoicqpa lkwf wdkvyq cyqvit ejrxwzq veptrgqj fcxisqnv http://www.zslqajxpw.obcfpw.com
haoxgui jecxhoa
qmslgnwer gnwpuejs jzonaup zkynlqo olhe olmdtjwce manfbwjq <A href="http://www.mxsev.kdsxrjg.com">nzltaybuo fpegmiyr</A>
Equity markets perspective
What about from the perspective of an individual investor with limited funds? I agree that the upside could be very good. However I hope I don't run out of money before the market turns. I would guess that unemployment figures would be another good leading indicator. I wonder what motivated Buffett to buy GSK on the way down? I remember a time when pharma stocks were a defensive play...not the case this decade.
Add your thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our comment guidelines.advertisement

qjwu ujsh
sbrijh vawypghn vfhjqlk vzdctjp thwjkbxn dypuj rtqmghdpl
Mar 19, 2008 13:57:21 PM [permalink] [report comment]