Barack Obama's Bad Decision on Public Financing
Sen. Barack Obama did not do his integrity any favor by going back on his pledge to use public financing this fall in the final months of the campaign. It will cost him, at least in the short run.
Instead of the $85 million in taxpayer money, Obama will most likely raise at least three times that amount in the home stretch of this election cycle marathon of words and dollars.
Obama's flip-flop will get strong hits from the McCain camp and rightly so. McCain, in need of money, is going the public route, and he'll make repeated references to the comparison and Obama's change of mind.
All this means that the presidency, in many ways, is up for sale in November. Obama's growing army of small contributors will be closely matched by independent groups for McCain. That independent money will be used largely for attack TV advertising by the business community, which shudders at the prospect of a Democratic president and Congress.
All of this matters little to the voters, who are more concerned about the high cost of gasoline, a worrisome economy, and the never-ending wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Food on the table beats a he said-he said debate over campaign cash.
The truth is that public financing has never really caught on with voters since 1976. Even though the taxpayer's small checkoff every year is only $3 and does not add to the tax bill, taxpayers are more apt to check the NO column on their return.
Senator Obama, even in his wildest dreams, could not have imagined his campaign would become a cash cow. It met and then surpassed the Clinton money-raising machine and is now poised for more millions to run against McCain
This issue will not defeat Obama, but he looks smaller this week to me and others who worry about the presidency on the auction block.
Tags: presidential election 2008 | Barack Obama | campaign finance
Tools:
Share
|
| Comments (26) | Print
Reader Comments
Obama did the right thing
Bad journalism by Mashek.
Remember how Kerry was swift-boated in 2004, by a 527 group financed by a TEXAS OIL PROFITEER?
Is there any guarantee that Obama won't be swift-boated? The RNC has a big advantage today. Slanderous Faux news is the RNC mouthpiece. Lies are spreading throughout the internet. It is not a level playing field.
Obama needs all the help he can get to fight the smears.
Good! Maybe he can win this way
The presidency has "always" been for sale, mostly to Republicans. It's just alarming the GOP that an upstart like Obama can raise enough little pittances from individuals to make a competitive war chest. Every 527 in the conservative world is going to unleash against Barack and Michelle this fall, and he has to answer every one of them as well as run against McCain in order to win
I'm proud of him for making decisions that might help him win, not "ashamed" of him for not being boxed into a corner like the Republicans expected
Campaign Financing
I'm one of the 1.5+ million small donors to the Obama campaign. Unlike lobbyists, I don't want anything for my donation other than to help elect a true leader and not simply a politician. I think it's unfair to say that Obama's integity is in question, when he simply changed his mind to defend himself from the "swift-boat" Republicans. Bad writing ,John.
Add your thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.advertisement

John W. Mashek covered politics in Washington for four decades with U.S. News & World Report, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, and the Boston Globe. His primary beats were Congress, the White House, and national politics. He covered every presidential election from 1960 to 1996. He was a panelist in three televised presidential debates in 1984, 1988, and 1992.