Saturday, July 19, 2008

Opinion

Nader the Egotist

February 25, 2008 11:35 AM ET | John Mashek | Permanent Link

In case you haven't heard, Ralph Nader is running for president. This is no political joke.

The onetime honorable champion of consumers in the 1960s has already besmirched that legacy. He is now a bitter loner on an ego trip with little backing.

At 74, if Nader lives long enough, he will become another Harold Stassen of American politics. Stassen, in his youth a golden boy of Republican politics in Minnesota and beyond, became a subject for comedians when he ran for president so many times that no one counted anymore.

In 2000, Nader attracted only 2.7 percent of the vote as the Green Party candidate. But he drew 92,000 votes in pivotal Florida, thus giving the country George W. Bush rather than Al Gore.

Asked on Meet the Press whether he could cost the Democrats another victory in 2008, Nader advised the party to "get over it." He denied his role in 2000 and still does with a straight face.

There is no logical way Nader can escape the responsibility for being the spoiler eight years ago. Most Democrats have been furious at his audacity ever since.

Nader managed only a puny 0.3 percent when he ran again in 2004. But he obviously failed to get the message of his futility.

Nader almost dismissed Sen. Barack Obama as the presumptive Democratic nominee for an inability to "get things done" as president. Maybe he is delusional and thinks he could.

No one disputes Nader's right to run. He meets the constitutional requirements: at least 35 years old and a citizen born in this country. Beyond those qualifications, what does Ralph Nader bring to the political dialogue this year?

Answer: nothing except for his own inflated ego. Aside from the initial "he's-in" reports, he should be ignored and will be.

Tags: presidential election 2008 | Ralph Nader

Tools: Share | | Comments (1)

Reader Comments

It takes someone really special to divine a selfish reason for Nader to run for president and to decide that anyone besides the Supreme Court could be held responsible for Gore loosing in 2000.

Add your thoughts

All comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

About the Capital View Blog

John MashekJohn W. Mashek covered politics in Washington for four decades with U.S. News & World Report, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, and the Boston Globe. His primary beats were Congress, the White House, and national politics. He covered every presidential election from 1960 to 1996. He was a panelist in three televised presidential debates in 1984, 1988, and 1992.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.