Ron Paul, the Political Wild Card in This Presidential Election
While most Republicans are likely to consider Rep. Ron Paul of Texas a mere pest, his devoted followers could be a problem for Sen. John McCain in November.
Paul, the GOP congressman with the squeaky voice but with a following of vocal supporters, will not go away. He's suspended his presidential campaign but his crusade goes on.
Paul got into the presidential race with no chance of winning. But his opposition to the war in Iraq, his isolationist foreign policy, and his leave-us-alone views on the domestic front won him faithful supporters during the debates earlier this year.
Based on those performances, the Paul campaign raised millions of dollars, especially on the Internet. As of the end of April, he had pulled in $35 million, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, which tracks these things. It was one of the surprises in this campaign with many twists and turns.
Now Paul's band of followers are planning their own little rump convention in September, when the GOP meets in the Twin Cities to certify McCain. While the real convention meets in St. Paul, the Paul crowd plans a meeting on the University of Minnesota campus in Minneapolis.
The Paul meeting is certain to draw some coverage during the highly programmed main event across the river. The media loves a little controversy amid an orchestrated convention.
Earlier, Paul's website reports a rally next month in Washington. It is called a rally for "freedom, peace, and prosperity."
The Libertarian Party has already endorsed former Rep. Bob Barr of Georgia, a crusty right winger, as its presidential nominee. But Barr has little following compared with Paul, a previous Libertarian candidate who has not endorsed the Georgian.
Paul has serious disagreements with the nominees of both major parties. It is hard to see him back either McCain or Barack Obama. Paul is certain to win re-election in his congressional district south of Houston. He'll barely have to sweat.
The Republican nightmare is for Paul backers to stay at home in a close presidential election. It could happen, since everything else has this campaign.
Tags: presidential election 2008 | Ron Paul | John McCain
Tools:
Share
|
| Comments (209) | Print
Reader Comments
"isolationist foreign policy"
"John W. Mashek covered politics in Washington for four decades with U.S. News & World Report, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, and the Boston Globe. His primary beats were Congress, the White House, and national politics. He covered every presidential election from 1960 to 1996. He was a panelist in three televised presidential debates in 1984, 1988, and 1992."
Mr Mashek, even you Sir have a problem grassping the difference between Isolationism and NON-Interventionism
Let me explain to you:
Isolationism foreign policy is the Bush-Administration policy: It creates more enemies due to the interventionism
Non-Interventionist foreign policy: Is the one advocated by the founfing fathers: Trade with all nations, talk to all nations and entangle alliances with none
False Information about Dr. Paul
Ron Paul does not have an "isolationist foreign policy" as the author of this column says. Mr. Mashek obviously has not read Paul's "The Manifesto" and yet speaks with all-knowing authority. The blogosphere is full of windbags who pronounce to all us "how it is" and yet huge portions of what we are fed are utter nonsense.
Hack journalism
This man should be ashamed of himself, releasing this kind of trash. This article is bias and full of misinformation. Just think, Dr. Paul is putting up with all this to fight for the very people who are smearing him. It reminds me of another person I know.
Add your thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.advertisement

John W. Mashek covered politics in Washington for four decades with U.S. News & World Report, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, and the Boston Globe. His primary beats were Congress, the White House, and national politics. He covered every presidential election from 1960 to 1996. He was a panelist in three televised presidential debates in 1984, 1988, and 1992.