Friday, November 27, 2009

Opinion

Mary Kate Cary

Karl Rove Is Right About Obama's Coming Banana Republic Economy

March 26, 2009 10:21 AM ET | Mary Kate Cary | Permanent Link | Print

By Mary Kate Cary, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

This morning's Wall Street Journal includes a good op-ed pointing out the discrepancy between the president's statement on Tuesday that his budget moves us from an era of "borrow and spend" to an era of "save and invest." Take a look at this and then I'll tell you who wrote it:

Last fiscal year, the deficit was $459 billion. For this fiscal year, it was $569 billion when Mr. Obama took office. Under his proposals, another $1.276 trillion will be added to the deficit this year, for a total of $1.845 trillion.

The CBO says deficits will fall for three years to $658 billion, still nearly 50% larger than any past deficit. After that, deficits go back up every year, reaching the trillion-dollar a year mark again in nine years. By 2019, the debt would reach 82.4% of GDP, a level not seen since 1947. With astonishing candor, even Peter Orszag, the president's budget director conceded these levels of deficits and debt are "unsustainable."

Federal spending will under Mr. Obama top $4 trillion this year. This translates into 28.5% of GDP—a level exceeded only at the height of World War II. According to the president's plans, spending will thereafter slow for three years, but then grow faster than the economy for the next seven years and beyond. Spending rises by $3.1 trillion from 2009-19, including $911 billion for legislation signed during his first two months in office ...

Mr. Obama is violating every tenet of his promise "to spend wisely, reform bad habits, and do our business in the light of day." ... Invoking the language of fiscal responsibility, he is engineering prosperity-killing deficits and bankrupting spending.

As much as everyone loves to hate Karl Rove, it's hard to argue with his facts, which are right out of the administration's budget and economic projections. He's got a point—how can the president's budget possibly be called a "save and invest" budget? Running public debt to a level above 80 percent of GNP is on a par with a banana republic. As Bill Bennett would say, Where's the outrage?

The president is holding a "virtual town hall" this morning at 11:30 EDT, with live streaming on the internet. You can click here to submit a question. I'm hoping citizens will ask the tough questions that the president needs to hear—about his massive expansion of the federal government that he says is "inseparable" from the economic recovery. I hope someone asks about the tax burden we're putting on our children and the ramifications for the American economy long after President Obama is out of office. Maybe someone will ask him how he plans to end the era of "borrow and spend."

You can argue for fiscal restraint and still be in favor of long-term investments to grow our economy. You can question the president's spending priorities and still believe in "change." You can stand up for responsibility and still have hope.

On Facebook? You can keep up with Thomas Jefferson Street blog postings through Facebook's Networked Blogs.

Tags: economy | federal budget | Barack Obama | Karl Rove

Tools: Share | | Comments (10) | Print

Reader Comments

Let's Argue about Abortion...

Or Stem Cells or separation of Church and state. I know, let's point out how "white people cant dance", and "black people steal"!

Our economy has dropped in the tank, and our futures are mortgaged to the hilt. It wouldn't matter who's plan we followed, we would be here now. Our greed, and our reverence for wealth over common sense is what put us here.

You know what would make this better? Let's point fingers and make veiled accusations over "who's a racist/bigot" or "who's a welfare cheat/socialist"!? Come on, it'll be great!

We are a country that has forgotten that sacrifice built us. Conservatives (I am one, by the way)think that their duty is to "conserve their wealth". It is more important to Conserve our Republic and our country's viability as an economic and political leader.

Goldwater didn't sell out, he saw through.

One last thought...

Why are "Unions" OK but "Universal healthcare" makes us "Socialists"? It is a perverse twist of thought.

562 x 3.38 = 1899.56 Billion or 1.856 TRILLION

proved my point

Chris Perry -----

For those of you that may not know (like Chris Perry of GA), 1.9 trillion is 238% higher than 562 billion, not 338% higher.

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Mary Kate Cary is a former White House speechwriter for President George H.W. Bush. She currently writes speeches for political and business leaders.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

People who read this also read ...

advertisement

Thomas Jefferson St.

GOP Can Be Thankful for Strong Polls

But they cannot get complacent.

5 Reasons for a Democratic Thanksgiving

Michael Steele and healthcare reform top the list.

Women Have Say on Health Reform

If it's the year of the women, why are there so few of them?

Turkey Tax

Uncle Sam is joining in on your Thanksgiving dinner.

Ideological Labels Just Don't Fit

Hard-liners don't understand that some of us don't toe an ideological line.

A Decade in Biased Review

How well does the video sum up the last decade?

GOPers Push European-Style Litmus Tests

Some RNC members want strict party platforms. Why do they hate America?

Cartoon Gallery

Editorial Cartoon

Political Cartoons

Check out our most recent cartoons.

Public Opinion

Should the GOP Have a Litmus Test?

Should the RNC exclude politicians who don't match the party's platform?

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.