Friday, November 27, 2009

Opinion

Letters and Comments

Beating a Hasty Retreat?

October 06, 2008 12:32 PM ET | Permanent Link | Print

Reader Comments

hasty retreat

Those in favor of a withdrawal from Iraq should consider the regional and world consequences. Iraq without American forces will not withstand the radical Islamic forces (closely supported by Iran) that America has been fighting for the past five years. Within a year or two Iraq can be expected to fall under the control of Iran. Thus Iran would then control the oil of both countries. Its heightened power, probably magnified further by nuclear weapons, will give it control by threat of the other Arab oi-states. Within Obama's term of office the US and the West are likely to find that Iran and its Islamic jihadist proxies control the majority of the world's oil on the one hand and can threaten Europe with nuclear weapons on the other.

Further, Iran's goading of Israel and its arming of Hizbullah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza with massive amounts of missiles could explode into a regional war bringing in Syria, possibly Egypt, Israel, Iran, Iraq and it is possible that nuclear weapons would be employed. The ensuing conflagration may spill over into the Pakistan-India arena, also both armed with nuclear weapons and currently standing off at a tense truce. The above chaos, destruction, massive carnage, and international economic disruption would undoubtedly ignite violence in other countries with mass rioting by Moslems and possibly accompanied by 9/11 mass murders by El Qaeda mole cells in key European and American cities.

Let's consider that before we call for a hasty "redeployment" out of Iraq.

"Hasty" retreat?

What's hasty about a war in a country the size of just one of our states that has already lasted longer than WWI or WWII that encompassed the entire of all Europe?

What have we gained but record debts to saddle many future U.S. generations with while leaving Iraq with a wealthy greedy leadership that cares nothing about their population that has its infrastructure looking like the stone age with no water, sewer or electricity services?

And the longer our combat troops remain, the worse it gets for the population.

Not to mention the more it costs us in deaths, injuries and money we don't have.

The people in the streets say that freedom is nice, but they sorely miss the services they had when they were not free.

Add your thoughts

All comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

About This Blog

Welcome to the U.S. News Readers' Letters and Comments blog. Positive or negative, reader feedback provides added perspective to any story. New letters and comments will be posted here several times a week. Thank you for your submission.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.