Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Opinion

John Aloysius Farrell

The Right Reason to Shut Down the CIA's Bin Laden Assassination Program

July 14, 2009 10:36 AM ET | John Aloysius Farrell | Permanent Link | Print

By John Aloysius Farrell, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

There is only one good reason for Leon Panetta to have shut down the CIA's secret program to kill Osama bin Laden. And it is not that Dick Cheney didn't tell Congress about it.

It's that, apparently, it didn't work.

I'm with the hawks on this one. I would be more shocked and furious to discover that we don't have a team of assassins on the trail of the al Qaeda leaders, than to nitpick the Bush administration for not furnishing every last detail to Congress.

Every sentient being on the planet (and that presumably includes members of Congress) knows we want to kill bin Laden. We have been shooting cruise missiles at al Qaeda for years. And everyone on Earth knows we now fly armed drones in the skies over Pakistan and Afghanistan, firing down at various al Qaeda and Taliban targets. But the Bush White House, apparently, did not inform Congress that there was also a CIA program to deploy specially-trained teams of assassins on the ground.

So what? Anyone who read Ghost Wars, Steve Coll's book on Afghanistan, knows that the CIA has been trying to get agency-led groups of Afghans to shoot, blow up or kidnap bin Laden for a decade—going back before 9/11, into the Clinton years. Reportedly, Congress was not informed of the beefed-up Bush-era program because Cheney and others wanted to keep it secret, for security reasons, until an operation was set to go. And that may be the real scandal. Granted, it is no easy task to find an al Qaeda leader and, with the help of the locals, to infiltrate and assassinate a well-protected terrorist.

But seven years and zero attempts?

It sounds like our intelligence agencies are still operating with the same limitations that the 9/11 commission described: an over-reliance on technology, lack of knowledge about the habits and customs (and language) of the targets, and an inability to get (human) spies in close. If not, and the Bush-era operation was in fact making real progress, it would be a terrible mistake for President Obama and Panetta to shut it down to soothe some ruffled feathers on the Hill, and thus force the intelligence community to start over, and re-invent the wheel.

The tough question that Congress needs to be asking is: Why didn't it work? Not: Why weren't we told?

Tags: CIA | Osama bin Laden | Dick Cheney

Tools: Share | | Comments (7) | Print

Reader Comments

and Obama didn't push when Pakistan push their troop in war

when the pakistan sign another peace deal with the Taliban then now he push the line near the border, so far US still short of troop in that 1 province that they wana push the Taliban, 2 kill 1 captures when the taliban counter attack, there score of deaths in Iraq too, lol they call it mission accomplish and then pull back rotf i can't belive that they almost hit the US embasador envoy to Iraq by IED that convoy on the road. Yeah Iraq it very safe huh?

!

Happy Bastille Day "nondescript guy from europe"

The real deal

Nobody in the world is interested what the US of A or any of its "leaders" does or does not want. We all want to get rid of this arrogant wannabe ruler of the world (USA).

You may want to think that you are the saviors. Exactly like Russians here on the other side of planet. NOT.

We dont want you. If Bin Ladin or any other fighter could blow up your holy (money) shrines, then we are all happy.

Of course the politicians will not tell you that, they will be wailing like Yasser Arafat after 911.

But the truth is short and you will not like it.

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

John Aloysius Farrell is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. An award-winning Washington reporter, he has written for The Boston Globe and The Denver Post and is the author of Tip O’Neill and the Democratic Century and an upcoming biography of the great American defense attorney, Clarence Darrow.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

People who read this also read ...

Thomas Jefferson St.

Women Have Say on Health Reform

If it's the year of the women, why are there so few of them?

Turkey Tax

Uncle Sam is joining in on your Thanksgiving dinner.

Ideological Labels Just Don't Fit

Hard-liners don't understand that some of us don't toe an ideological line.

A Decade in Biased Review

How well does the video sum up the last decade?

GOPers Push European-Style Litmus Tests

Some RNC members want strict party platforms. Why do they hate America?

Can Conservative Carly Fiorina Carry Cali?

Ronald Reagan's state is now one of the most liberal in the nation.

Opinions Clash on Wars in Iran, Afghanistan

Fewer favor the effort in Afghanistan, support rises for hostilities against Iran's nuclear program.

Bennet's Senate Seat Is Already at Risk

His vote on healthcare would be less a case of political martyrdom than it may seem.

Cartoon Gallery

Editorial Cartoon

Political Cartoons

Check out our most recent cartoons.

Public Opinion

Should the GOP Have a Litmus Test?

Should the RNC exclude politicians who don't match the party's platform?

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.