Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Opinion

John Aloysius Farrell

The Right Reason to Shut Down the CIA's Bin Laden Assassination Program

July 14, 2009 10:36 AM ET | John Aloysius Farrell | Permanent Link | Print

By John Aloysius Farrell, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

There is only one good reason for Leon Panetta to have shut down the CIA's secret program to kill Osama bin Laden. And it is not that Dick Cheney didn't tell Congress about it.

It's that, apparently, it didn't work.

I'm with the hawks on this one. I would be more shocked and furious to discover that we don't have a team of assassins on the trail of the al Qaeda leaders, than to nitpick the Bush administration for not furnishing every last detail to Congress.

Every sentient being on the planet (and that presumably includes members of Congress) knows we want to kill bin Laden. We have been shooting cruise missiles at al Qaeda for years. And everyone on Earth knows we now fly armed drones in the skies over Pakistan and Afghanistan, firing down at various al Qaeda and Taliban targets. But the Bush White House, apparently, did not inform Congress that there was also a CIA program to deploy specially-trained teams of assassins on the ground.

So what? Anyone who read Ghost Wars, Steve Coll's book on Afghanistan, knows that the CIA has been trying to get agency-led groups of Afghans to shoot, blow up or kidnap bin Laden for a decade—going back before 9/11, into the Clinton years. Reportedly, Congress was not informed of the beefed-up Bush-era program because Cheney and others wanted to keep it secret, for security reasons, until an operation was set to go. And that may be the real scandal. Granted, it is no easy task to find an al Qaeda leader and, with the help of the locals, to infiltrate and assassinate a well-protected terrorist.

But seven years and zero attempts?

It sounds like our intelligence agencies are still operating with the same limitations that the 9/11 commission described: an over-reliance on technology, lack of knowledge about the habits and customs (and language) of the targets, and an inability to get (human) spies in close. If not, and the Bush-era operation was in fact making real progress, it would be a terrible mistake for President Obama and Panetta to shut it down to soothe some ruffled feathers on the Hill, and thus force the intelligence community to start over, and re-invent the wheel.

The tough question that Congress needs to be asking is: Why didn't it work? Not: Why weren't we told?

Tags: CIA | Osama bin Laden | Dick Cheney

Tools: Share | | Comments (7) | Print

Reader Comments

and Obama didn't push when Pakistan push their troop in war

when the pakistan sign another peace deal with the Taliban then now he push the line near the border, so far US still short of troop in that 1 province that they wana push the Taliban, 2 kill 1 captures when the taliban counter attack, there score of deaths in Iraq too, lol they call it mission accomplish and then pull back rotf i can't belive that they almost hit the US embasador envoy to Iraq by IED that convoy on the road. Yeah Iraq it very safe huh?

!

Happy Bastille Day "nondescript guy from europe"

The real deal

Nobody in the world is interested what the US of A or any of its "leaders" does or does not want. We all want to get rid of this arrogant wannabe ruler of the world (USA).

You may want to think that you are the saviors. Exactly like Russians here on the other side of planet. NOT.

We dont want you. If Bin Ladin or any other fighter could blow up your holy (money) shrines, then we are all happy.

Of course the politicians will not tell you that, they will be wailing like Yasser Arafat after 911.

But the truth is short and you will not like it.

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

U.S. News Weekly

Free Trial!

Get the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine free for four weeks!

John Aloysius Farrell is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. An award-winning Washington reporter, he has written for The Boston Globe and The Denver Post and is the author of Tip O’Neill and the Democratic Century and an upcoming biography of the great American defense attorney, Clarence Darrow.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

Thomas Jefferson St.

GOP Sets Terms for Healthcare Summit

Boehner and Cantor are forcing the president to treat the Republicans as equal partners.

Palin’s Fundraising Letter Has Bad Grammar

With all the money she spent, you’d think she could hire a competent proofreader.

Republicans Sought Money They Denounced

GOP For Stimulus After They Were Against It

Mary Kate Cary Right on Sarah Palin

Like Palin, readers should do their homework.

Memo to Sarah Palin: Prepare Next Time

She should know core values like the back of her hand.

GOP Should Beware Obama’s Healthcare Invite

It will be carefully staged to make the president look moderate.

Top Political Nonfiction

A fix to Cilizza’s list.

Why the Tea Party Convention Was a Bad Idea

Right now they have more power as a grassroots movement, that’s bigger than any panel discussion.

Public Opinion

Palin's Hand Notes

Should the GOP's star have been more prepared on major issues?

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.